European Court Rules Against UK on VAT Treatment of Futures Trading

Charles Riordan
June 4, 2020

In the midst of ongoing negotiations following the UK’s exit from the European Union (EU), the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has ruled that the UK has impermissibly expanded the scope of its 0% VAT rate on futures trading.  And, that this has been occurring over a period spanning more than forty years. While this ruling doesn’t overturn current UK policy – as affirmed in a subsequent statement from HMRC – it does require the UK to seek authorization from the European Commission to continue applying it. How and when the UK will comply with the judgment, and what the Commission’s response will be, adds to the current uncertainty for businesses operating in the UK.

Case C-276/19, European Commission v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, stems from breach proceedings brought by the European Commission in March of 2018. But the roots of the dispute arose decades ago. In 1977, the UK told the Commission that it intended to maintain zero-rating for eleven “terminal markets”, on the basis that the futures trading conducted were not transactions in goods, but instead “of the nature of financing or insurance.” Following that notification, zero-rating was expanded beyond the original eleven markets (later additions included trades in gas and electricity, for example). The CJEU found the UK’s justification for the additions – that they were in response to a restructuring in the London commodity markets – unconvincing, given that some of the changes involved newly existing transactions such as trading in carbon emissions allowances.

The political implications

The political implications of the CJEU’s judgment are unclear, but what is known is that the UK must:

  1. Pay the Commission’s legal costs, and
  2. Seek authorization to continue applying the zero-rate to any transactions added to the UK legislation since 1977.

The CJEU did note that nothing in its judgment addressed the question of whether the Commission should grant authorization. Meanwhile, HMRC has stated it will be reviewing the decision and that the current rules apply for the time being.

The ruling is likely to increase tensions between the UK and the EU in the run up to the end of the Brexit transition period on 31 December 2020. Whether both sides can reach an ongoing trade agreement to include a resolution of this issue remains to be seen. Affected businesses should watch HMRC announcements for updates.  

Take Action

To find out more about what we believe the future holds, download Trends: Continuous Global VAT Compliance and follow us on LinkedIn and Twitter to keep up-to-date with regulatory news and other updates.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.


Charles Riordan

Charles Riordan is a member of the Regulatory Analysis team at Sovos specializing in international taxation, with a focus on Value Added Tax systems in the European Union. Charles received his J.D. from Boston College Law School in 2013 and is an active member of the Massachusetts Bar.
Share This Post

LATAM VAT & Fiscal Reporting
May 20, 2020
Sovos Acquires Taxweb, Extends Tax Determination Capabilities in World’s Most Challenging Compliance Landscape

Earlier this month Sovos announced its second acquisition of 2020, completing our solution for Brazil with an unparalleled offering that solves tax compliance in the place where it is most challenging to do so.  Too many companies doing business in Brazil have been burdened by managing multiple point solutions for continuous transaction controls (CTCs), tax […]

Sales & Use Tax United States
December 1, 2020
Does Oregon Have Economic Nexus Rules?

Following the South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. decision, the majority of states enacted legislation on how remote sellers and marketplace facilitators must collect and remit sales tax. However, Oregon has no economic nexus because it does not have a sales tax. Enforcement date: N/A Sales/transactions threshold: N/A Measurement period: N/A Included transactions/sales: N/A When You […]

Sales & Use Tax United States
December 1, 2020
Is There a Missouri Economic Nexus Sales Tax?

After the South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. decision, almost every state incorporated changes to how remote sellers must collect and remit sales tax. However, Missouri has not yet finalized legislation relating to an economic nexus sales tax. While Missouri has introduced several bills aimed at enacting economic nexus rules, none have become law. But this […]

December 1, 2020
Data Accuracy for Insurers – The Cost of Getting it Wrong

With tax calculations being mainly data-driven in the insurance industry, it’s imperative that data provided is complete and accurate. Yet gaps in datasets and missing information still happen from time to time presenting a challenge for insurance companies. These gaps can cause a delay in filings which in turn, can lead to penalties and interest […]

Sales & Use Tax United States
November 30, 2020
Important Details on the Tennessee Economic Nexus

Following the South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. decision, almost every state has adjusted its sales tax nexus. The Tennessee economic nexus is no exception. Initially, Tennessee required remote sellers with $500,000 or more in sales to Tennessee customers to register and collect Tennessee sales and use tax. However, as of October 1, 2020, the threshold […]

Sales & Use Tax United States
November 30, 2020
West Virginia Sales Tax Nexus Details

The West Virginia sales tax nexus changed after the South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. decision. Effective January 1, 2019, remote sellers that have no physical presence in the state must now register, collect and remit sales and use taxes in West Virginia should they meet the threshold or transaction amount. In addition to the remote […]