International Tax Changes During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Charles Maniace
March 19, 2020

In the last several weeks, we have monitored many efforts by federal, state and local governments to provide relief to both businesses and individual taxpayers impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic.

As they relate to indirect tax (VAT/Sales Tax/GST), the measures enacted to-date have followed varying paths. Here are a few examples of the types of changes that are currently taking place to help ease the burden on taxpayers during these turbulent times.

  1. Standard Indirect Rate Reductions – For example, effective April 1 and extending through May 31, 2020 the country of Cyprus will decrease their standard VAT rate and their reduced rate by 2%. A similar proposal is being discussed in Jamaica.
  2. Temporary Tax Holidays – The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico announced a “Tax Holiday” commencing on March 23 and ending on April 30. During this time, their indirect tax (IVU) will not apply on certain necessities such as hand sanitizers, soap, shampoo, tissues, masks, isopropyl alcohol, disinfectants, antiseptics, household cleaning products, gloves, pain relievers and antihistamines.
  3. Automatic Extensions of Filing Deadlines and Licenses set to Expire – In Denmark, filing deadlines have been extended by 30 days for March, April and May.  In Kansas, given that the Alcoholic Beverage Commission is closing, all active alcoholic beverage licenses set to expire between March 19 and April 30 will receive an automatic 30-day extension
  4. Permissive Postponement of Tax Collection and Enforcement Activities – This seems to be the most common form of relief being offered in indirect tax. Generally, they involve actions such as extensions of filing and payment deadlines, granting requests for penalty abatement for late filings and payments, allowing tax remittance pursuant to a payment plan, and an agreed suspension of audit activities, being permissively granted on a case by case basis when the taxpayer can demonstrate a COVID-19 related challenge.

The benefit of indirect-tax related relief for individual taxpayers experiencing personal economic strife can be debated. While temporary rate reductions and tax holidays have some considerable political appeal, there are those that would argue that direct relief in the form of direct payments/subsidies to individual citizens (for example as is currently being contemplated by the US federal government) is a far more efficient means of providing relief.

For businesses, these temporary tax measures can represent a substantial hardship. In this time of crisis, are companies particularly vigilant about monitoring and tracking indirect tax rate and rule changes? Will they have the resources available to clearly account for the subtle nuances involved in a sales tax holiday? In the best of times, these types of changes can strain available resources, never mind right now.

Conversely, the benefit of deferred compliance obligations for businesses can be substantial and immediate, especially for companies relying on manual processes and procedures that cannot be executed nearly as efficiently with a remote, distracted or absent workforce. However, when such relief is only granted upon request, the question remains will organizations know such options exist and apply for relief and will there be governmental employees on hand to grant said relief in a timely manner.

Many economists argue that the best tax systems are those that operate entirely behind the scenes, have minimal impact of economic activity, and allow for automated compliance. The gold standard is those countries that have adopted continuous transaction controls that rely heavily on automation and computing power to effectuate compliance. The best companies have scalable and comprehensive automated systems in place, allowing them to effectively control tax compliance out if a single center of excellence as opposed to exposing themselves to multiple points of failure.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Charles Maniace

Charles Maniace is Vice President – Regulatory Analysis & Design at Sovos, a leading global provider of software that safeguards businesses from the burden and risk of modern tax. An attorney by trade, Chuck leads a team of attorneys and tax professionals responsible for all the tax and regulatory content that keeps Sovos customers continually compliant. Over his 15 year career in tax and regulatory automation, he has provided analysis to the Wall Street Journal, NBC and more.
Share This Post

LATAM VAT & Fiscal Reporting
May 20, 2020
Sovos Acquires Taxweb, Extends Tax Determination Capabilities in World’s Most Challenging Compliance Landscape

Earlier this month Sovos announced its second acquisition of 2020, completing our solution for Brazil with an unparalleled offering that solves tax compliance in the place where it is most challenging to do so.  Too many companies doing business in Brazil have been burdened by managing multiple point solutions for continuous transaction controls (CTCs), tax […]

E-Invoicing Compliance EMEA Italy VAT & Fiscal Reporting
December 2, 2020
Italian Tax Controls: Five Key Facts to Know Before the New Year

While Italy rolled out its continuous transaction controls (CTC) reform in 2019, 2020 has been a year of expansion. Italian authorities plan to leverage all potential benefits of the successful implementation of the country’s central e-invoicing platform. Many of the updates will either be launched or enforced in the upcoming year, or later in 2022. […]

Tax Compliance Tax Information Reporting United States
December 1, 2020
Unclaimed Property Dormancy Periods by State: What You Need to Know

Understanding unclaimed property dormancy periods by state and executing the appropriate decisions can make or break your company’s unclaimed property program. This is due primarily to the fact that each state has varying dormancy periods. To complicate matters even further, each state has specific dormancy periods for each corresponding property type. As a result, determining […]

Sales & Use Tax United States
December 1, 2020
How Was the Nevada Economic Nexus Law Modified?

When the Supreme Court ruled on South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc., remote sellers and marketplace facilitators across the country had to make changes in how they collected and remitted sales tax. The Nevada economic nexus law is one example of a state modifying its requirements for both remote sellers and marketplace facilitators in relation to […]

Sales & Use Tax United States
December 1, 2020
Does Oregon Have Economic Nexus Rules?

Following the South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. decision, the majority of states enacted legislation on how remote sellers and marketplace facilitators must collect and remit sales tax. However, Oregon has no economic nexus because it does not have a sales tax. Enforcement date: N/A Sales/transactions threshold: N/A Measurement period: N/A Included transactions/sales: N/A When You […]

Sales & Use Tax United States
December 1, 2020
Is There a Missouri Economic Nexus Sales Tax?

After the South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. decision, almost every state incorporated changes to how remote sellers must collect and remit sales tax. However, Missouri has not yet finalized legislation relating to an economic nexus sales tax. While Missouri has introduced several bills aimed at enacting economic nexus rules, none have become law. But this […]