“Trends” Report Excerpt: The Consequences of VAT Non-Compliance

Christiaan Van Der Valk
December 23, 2019

The following is an excerpt from “Trends in Continuous Global VAT Compliance,” the 11th edition of the industry’s most comprehensive guide to e-invoicing, e-archiving and VAT reporting. The full report is available for download

To reduce the VAT gap, countries are pushing taxable organizations to comply with VAT requirements and enforcing different types of legal consequences for irregularities. The consequences VAT non-compliance can be significant. 

As a result, most companies want to be as certain as possible they can quickly and easily prove their VAT compliance to avoid risks, including:

  • Administrative fines: If a company cannot prove the veracity of invoices, it may be fined. Trading partners who have been drawn into an audit that leads to this conclusion may also be penalized.
  • Sanctions under criminal law: In some countries, non-compliance with invoicing requirements can be equated with tax evasion, which is typically liable to sanctions (e.g., fines, imprisonment) under criminal law.
  • Protracted audits: Audits should generally take only a few days, but many companies are audited for weeks or even months. This eats up precious expert resources and creates risks of more processes and documents being scrutinized and, potentially, found flawed or lacking.
  • Spill-over effects into other areas of taxation or accounting: Once a tax authority has established that a sales transaction cannot be evidenced, a company may also face sanctions in other areas of taxation. For example, non-recognition of an invoice for tax purposes may undermine the credibility of a company’s annual accounts or deductible expenses under corporate income tax.
  • Trading partner audits: The tax authority may have no choice but to verify the records and original documents of the audited company’s trading partners. This can negatively affect a company’s relationship with business partners.
  • Mutual assistance procedures: Auditors may need to call on their counterparts from other countries to obtain evidence about certain aspects of the company’s operations. Such procedures tend to be long and can tie up expensive expert resources within a company for months or even years.
  • Loss of right to deduct VAT: A company that does not have sufficient evidence of purchases — that cannot prove it was in control of its processes at the time of the transactions — may need to pay back input VAT it reclaimed on such purchases. With an average VAT rate of 20 percent, this means a high risk of that company retroactively losing more than its profit margin.
  • Obligation to pay VAT over fraudulent invoices: If a fraudster can easily forge invoices that are not reasonably distinguishable from a supplier’s normal invoices, a tax authority without credible evidence to the contrary may in extreme cases consider such invoices to have been issued by that supplier and claim output VAT payment if the buyer reclaimed the corresponding VAT. 
  • CTCs and data analysis: The introduction of CTCs and tax authorities’ growing ability to analyze vast amounts of transactional and other economic data collected directly from source systems rapidly makes compliance a much more binary proposition than before. In the post audit world, compliance was often a matter of legal interpretation where courts upheld standards of reasonableness such as proportionality, which tempered the desire of many tax authorities to penalize taxpayers for mere irregularities. The consequences of non-compliance in the CTC world is expected to become much tougher and far-reaching.

CTCs drive harsher penalties 

A recent example of the trend for countries with CTC regimes to toughen invoicing-related penalties is a recently adopted Mexican law (CS-LXIV-II-1P-006) that makes invoicing for, for example, non-existent operations a felony, equating potential invoicing errors with tax fraud and organised crime.

Take Action

Want to learn how to avoid risks associated with VAT non-compliance? Download the 11th edition of “Trends in Continuous Global VAT Compliance.”

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Christiaan Van Der Valk

Christiaan Van Der Valk is vice president, strategy. Elected a World Economic Forum Global Leader for Tomorrow in 2000, Christiaan is an internationally recognized voice on e-business strategy, law, policy, best practice and commercial issues. Formerly co-founder and president of Trustweaver (acquired by Sovos), Christiaan also holds long-standing leadership roles at the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) and the European E-invoicing Service Providers Association (EESPA). Over the past 20 years, he has presented at and authored key papers for international meetings at the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), the Asia Europe Meeting, World Trade Organization and several other UN agencies. Christiaan earned his Master of Laws degree from Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam.
Share This Post

LATAM VAT & Fiscal Reporting
May 20, 2020
Sovos Acquires Taxweb, Extends Tax Determination Capabilities in World’s Most Challenging Compliance Landscape

Earlier this month Sovos announced its second acquisition of 2020, completing our solution for Brazil with an unparalleled offering that solves tax compliance in the place where it is most challenging to do so.  Too many companies doing business in Brazil have been burdened by managing multiple point solutions for continuous transaction controls (CTCs), tax […]

EMEA Tax Compliance VAT & Fiscal Reporting
July 9, 2020
Tax IDs and List Checks: The New Trend

VAT gaps can generally be found in countries that collect indirect taxes. This hiatus has led many tax administrations to implement Continuous Transaction Controls (CTCs), through which transactional and accounting data are monitored in real-time or near real-time. However, even countries with sophisticated CTCs may encounter fraud involving missing traders and non-existent supplies. This creates […]

Tax Information Reporting United States
July 8, 2020
The Industry Leader in Tax and Regulatory Reporting

Last year, Sovos promised insurers we would Solve Tax for Good®. A year later, we have helped thousands of insurers ease the burden and risk of modern tax and regulatory compliance. We have kept our promise by helping insurers stay ahead of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, SECURE Act and all other tax and […]

EMEA IPT
July 8, 2020
The Changing Landscape for European Captives and the Challenges Ahead

Over recent years, the number of insurance captives domiciled in Europe has stagnated, if not fallen.  Against this backdrop, the challenges faced by captives across the region are rising and in particular, following the COVID-19 pandemic. A specialized market in restricted jurisdictions Europe is the third largest insurance captive domicile in the world having around […]

July 8, 2020
Sovos Acquires Accordance to Help Businesses Flexibly Navigate Changing VAT Compliance Requirements

Earlier this week, Sovos announced the acquisition of Accordance , a U.K.-based value-added tax (VAT) managed services company that has been a Sovos partner since 2018. Accordance adds a leading service provider with unique VAT expertise to our growing European organization, strengthening the foundation we have been building for continued global expansion. This acquisition — our […]

E-Invoicing Compliance EMEA Tax Compliance VAT & Fiscal Reporting
July 8, 2020
Turkey: Penalties for Noncompliance with the Mandatory Electronic Document Framework

For rules to carry any real weight, the rule-maker must combine compliance with that rule with either a carrot or a stick. In the field of tax legislation, the rule-maker, in this case, the legislator or the tax authority, almost always goes down the route of the stick in situations of noncompliance. And the penalties […]