Importers in the DtC Landscape: It’s Complicated

Alex Koral
November 8, 2019

To paraphrase, all of the beverage alcohol industry has to deal with complicated regulations; each member of the beverage alcohol market has to deal with regulations that are complicated in their own way. That is a long-winded way of saying that you may face unique restrictions and complications that other, seemingly similarly placed (i.e., same products, same relative tier) can avoid.

This is particularly true of importers, who generally seem to be on the same footing as other members of the “supplier” tier (like wineries and breweries), but in fact are often treated quite distinctly in federal and state regulations. 

Now, there is a lot that goes into being an importer, which will not be discussed here. (For more background, we recommend this recent article detailing the complications of bringing in new brands to the U.S.) Instead, this post will focus on the direct-to-consumer (DtC) wine shipping market, and whether and where importers can directly engage in that space.

Where Can Importers Ship Wine Direct?

When it comes to businesses licensed solely as importers (so holding only an Importer’s Basic Permit from the TTB, and no state-issued production/manufacturing licenses), the map for DtC shipping of wine is rather small. This is all due to how DtC shipping laws are written. 

Let’s look at Colorado’s law for wine shipments (C.R.S. 44-3-104, for those following along at home), which readily demonstrates the two key barriers standing in the way of importers shipping wine DtC. 

As enacted, the law provides that holders of a “winery direct shipper’s permit may sell and deliver wine that is produced or bottled by the permittee.” Further, the law states that the permit is only available to persons who “operate…a winery located in the United States and holds all state and federal licenses, permits, or both, necessary to operate the winery, including the federal winemaker’s and blender’s basic permit.”

A plain reading of the statute shows the problem and why importers cannot ship wine DtC to Colorado. They (generally) would not operate a winery in the U.S. nor hold the federal and state licenses needed to operate a winery—and so right off the bat would be unable to get the necessary license. However, even if they were able to get a DtC shipping license (perhaps they are a U.S. winery that doubly operates as an importer; they might even be part of a wine conglomerate and are importing their sister winery’s products), those imported wines would not be “produced or bottled” by them, but by the foreign winery who, again, cannot themselves hold the permit (lacking the necessary U.S. licenses). These laws effectively shut off Colorado residents from receiving foreign wine through a DtC shipment. 

This is as compared to New Hampshire’s law (NHRS 178:27), which reads, “any person currently licensed in its state of domicile as a wine manufacturer, beverage manufacturer, importer, wholesaler, or retailer shall apply for a direct shipper permit” (emphasis added). That little additional word makes a world of difference, as it clearly states that importers can also apply for the necessary license to ship wine DtC to New Hampshire residents. New Hampshire also does not have the same kind of “produced or bottled” law, meaning a DtC shipper can ship DtC any wines they are otherwise authorized to sell.

Unfortunately for importers, though, only New Hampshire and Wyoming have this explicit allowance for licensed importers to get the necessary DtC shipping license. Without other states changing their DtC shipping laws in a similar manner, importers face an extremely truncated map.

Is There Any Other Way?

One possible workaround for importers is to work in conjunction with a licensed wine producer. As alluded to above, production wineries can often also get licenses to act as importers of foreign wine. Under that arrangement, they can receive DtC licenses from the broadest swath of states (as licensed wine producers) and then DtC ship the wines that they personally import and distribute in the United States. 

However, also as noted above, they will have to contend with various states’ prohibitions on shipping wine DtC that they do not bottle or produce. Not all states have these laws, and even some states that do have those rules allow the DtC shipper to ship wines “they own” (i.e., have a COLA for); but they will still be an impediment to shipping to all 45 states that currently allow DtC shipping of wine.

The other solution available to importers is to also become licensed as retailers in the state they operate in and ship DtC to the states that permit it for retailers. For more information on where retailers are currently permitted to ship wine DtC, read this post.

However, trade practice restrictions make this unavailable in all states. For instance, importers in New York are required to be licensed as in-state wholesalers; however, the state’s trade practice laws prohibit holders of wholesale licenses from also being licensed as retailers. This is as opposed to California where holders of the Type 9 Importer license are able to also hold the Type 20 Retail license, and therefore can get the appropriate DtC shipping licenses in the 15 states that permit it.

Operating as a retailer is not just a matter of getting a license—in most states you are required to actually open a physical shop and offer all of your inventory to walk-in customers. Therefore relying on the retail DtC shipping model may be more burdensome than it’s worth, though it is an option for importers to explore.

As DtC shipping of wine has blossomed over the years, many various parties have looked to join the market. In recent years, retailers and distillers have made increasing efforts to gain the  same permissions that wine producers have been enjoying. Importers may also look to expand their ability to ship wine DtC across the country. But until the laws are amended, importers will face a severely truncated DtC shipping map and will need to find alternative arrangements where available.

 Request a demo of ShipCompliant today. 


Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.


Alex Koral

Alex Koral is Senior Regulatory Counsel for Sovos ShipCompliant in the company’s Boulder, Colorado office. He actively researches beverage alcohol regulations and market developments to inform development of Sovos’ ShipCompliant product and help educate the industry on compliance issues. Alex has been in the beverage alcohol arena since 2015, after receiving his J.D. from the University of Colorado Law School.
Share This Post

Latin America VAT & Fiscal Reporting
May 20, 2020
Sovos Acquires Taxweb, Extends Tax Determination Capabilities in World’s Most Challenging Compliance Landscape

Earlier this month Sovos announced its second acquisition of 2020, completing our solution for Brazil with an unparalleled offering that solves tax compliance in the place where it is most challenging to do so.  Too many companies doing business in Brazil have been burdened by managing multiple point solutions for continuous transaction controls (CTCs), tax […]

January 25, 2021
6 Highlights from the 2021 Direct-to-Consumer Wine Shipping Report

This January, Sovos ShipCompliant released the 2021 Direct-to-Consumer (DtC) Wine Shipping Report with our partner, Wines Vines Analytics. This report features exclusive data and insights on the state of the industry not tracked or reported on anywhere else. With wine shipments to consumers reaching a record $3.7 billion in 2020, there has never been a […]

January 22, 2021
The Data: Wine DtC Shipments and Off-Premise Retail (December 2020 Special Report)

The wine market is in greater flux than ever as producers, retailers and consumers navigate the impacts of a global pandemic. Keeping a pulse on marketplace data has never been so important given these shifting dynamics. Nielsen is collaborating with Wines Vines Analytics and Sovos ShipCompliant to provide a much more comprehensive view of the […]

January 21, 2021
HMRC’s Second IPT Consultation – Response Deadline Fast Approaching

HMRC, the UK’s tax authority, is asking for responses to its Insurance Premium Tax: Administration and Unfair Outcomes Consultation, by 5 February 2021. The first consultation and call for evidence for Insurance Premium Tax (IPT) was back in 2019 and questions focused on the modernisation of IPT and efficiency improvements for businesses and HMRC. It […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
January 21, 2021
How Ireland’s VAT Regime is Changing

As a result of Brexit, COVID-19, and the Finance Act 2020, the VAT regime in Ireland has and will continue to undergo numerous changes. Highlights of these changes are outlined below. Postponed Accounting and Reporting Changes Beginning in January all taxpayers have the ability to apply postponed VAT accounting to their imports from outside the […]

E-Invoicing Compliance Turkey
January 21, 2021
Audio Blog: Turkey: Which documents can replace e-delivery notes?

  Join Selin Adler Ring, Regulatory Counsel at Sovos, as she discusses how the Turkey E-delivery note and its impact on your multinational organization. Listen to her discuss the following questions:  What is the new e-delivery note system in Turkey? Can e-invoices be used to replace e-delivery notes as paper invoices can still replace paper […]