Showdown on the Prairie – Kansas AG Invalidates DOR Economic Nexus Pronouncement

Charles Maniace
October 3, 2019

In a startling development that appears intertwined with local Kansas politics, Attorney General Derek Schmidt issued an opinion that attempts to place a temporary halt to the Department of Revenue’s (DOR) plan to extend its sales tax compliance requirements to remote sellers as of October 1, 2019 – leaving taxpayers in a state of limbo. For sellers that have robust sales tax automation tools in place, however, the uncertainty created by these circumstances is far less problematic.

Back on August 1, 2019, the Kansas DOR published Notice 19-04. In short, the notice signaled the DOR’s intention to compel remote sellers to collect Kansas tax effective October 1, 2019. This action was somewhat remarkable as it came on the heels of a failed legislative attempt to pass a remote collection bill that was vetoed by the governor (for unrelated reasons). It was also unusual because it applied to all sellers regardless of the strength of their economic connection with Kansas, meaning that one sale into Kansas, no matter how small, creates a compliance requirement. 

What wasn’t particularly unusual was that the standard was promulgated exclusively by DOR action and not through legislation. Many states held the assertion that existing law gives them the authority to apply tax to the maximum extent allowed, and many states did not wait for their local legislature to act to put rules in place. While other states had a far different opinion, Kansas believed that it could not apply a small seller exemption (e.g. 200 transactions and/or $100,000 in gross sales) through its Notice but could only do so through legislation…and it turns out this assessment may come back to haunt the state government.

Without going into the particulars, the AG’s opinion holds that the Notice constitutes an invalid exercise of the DOR’s authority and accordingly there is no legally sufficient basis for it to compel remote collection on October 1. The opinion specifically points to the absence of a safe harbor for small taxpayers and hold, at a minimum, such a requirement could only come into existence through a more comprehensive notice and comment rulemaking process. As a result, the Notice has no force or legal effect.

However, Kansas Revenue Secretary Mark Burghart respectfully disagrees and in a statement published on the DOR website, he holds fast to his position that:

  • Notice 19-04 simply informs out-of-state retailers of the law that overwhelmingly passed the Legislature in 2003 that ensures the obligation of out-of-state retailers to collect and remit the taxes…The Notice does not reflect a change in policy, but only restates long-established statutory provisions regarding the duty to collect and remit Kansas taxes.
  • The Department of Revenue cannot select which laws it enforces. Kansas statutes are presumed to be constitutional, and unless deemed otherwise by a court of competent jurisdiction, the Department is obligated to enforce the statutes enacted by the Legislature.

In short – the DOR believes that the Notice is valid, that a collection requirement exists, and sellers should comply. Whether the DOR would move to enforce this new requirement through an assessment or audit in light of the Attorney General’s opinion remains uncertain. 

It’s possible that the DOR could deploy its rulemaking procedure to enact a remote collection requirement in a way that involves more procedure or formality, or maybe things become clear in a few months when the legislature reconvenes and possibly passes an economic nexus bill that the governor signs. 

However, sellers need not be paralyzed with fear or apprehension. Companies that have technology solutions in place that “Solve Tax for Good” are readily able to adapt to expanded, adjusted, revoked, or modified economic nexus standards.

Take Action

Download the presentation slides and recording from “The Speed of Sales Tax – How to Stay Ahead of Changing Regulations in 2019,” where Deloitte Tax LLP joins Chuck Maniace and Erik Wallin of Sovos to discuss trends in sales tax compliance that will impact tax professionals’ day-to-day processes and work.


Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.


Charles Maniace

Charles Maniace is Vice President – Regulatory Analysis & Design at Sovos. An attorney by trade, Chuck leads a team of attorneys responsible for all the tax and regulatory content that keeps Sovos clients continually compliant. Over his 14 year career in tax and regulatory automation, he has given talks and presentations on a variety of topics including The Taxation of High Tech Transactions, The Taxation of Remote Commerce, The Regulatory Implications of Brexit, The Rise of E-Audits, Form 1042-S Best Practices and Penalty Abatement Practices for Information Returns. Chuck is a member of the Massachusetts Bar and holds a B.S. in Business Economics from Bentley College, a J.D. from Boston University School of Law, and an LL.M in Taxation from Boston University School of Law.
Share This Post

ShipCompliant United States
January 24, 2020
6 Highlights from the 2020 Direct-to-Consumer Wine Shipping Report

This January, Sovos ShipCompliant released the 2020 Direct-to-Consumer (DtC) Wine Shipping Report with our partner, Wines Vines Analytics. The year 2020 marks the 10th annual DtC report, which features exclusive data and insights on the state of the industry not tracked or reported on anywhere else. With wine shipments to consumers reaching a record $3.2 […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
January 23, 2020
Romania Cancels VAT Split Payment Mechanism Effective 1 February 2020

Controls to close the VAT gap and combat VAT fraud The VAT gap for Europe remains around €137 billion every year, according to the latest report from the European Commission. This represents a loss of 11.2% of the expected VAT revenue for the region. The largest gaps were in Romania at 37.89%, Greece 33.6%, and […]

LATAM Mexico VAT & Fiscal Reporting
January 22, 2020
Hidden USMCA Compliance Pitfalls for American Companies in Mexico

As part of the recently updated “new NAFTA,” or USMCA, Mexico is enticing companies to move operations into its maquiladora zone of factories along the US border. Major benefits of relocation include exemptions from value-added tax (VAT) and other taxes for qualifying manufacturers, along with a VAT rate reduced by half applied to local transactions […]

Asia Pacific Tax Compliance VAT & Fiscal Reporting
January 21, 2020
China: Draft VAT Law Review

The Ministry of Finance and the State Taxation Administration are pressing ahead with China’s VAT reform having issued a Consultation Draft of the VAT law of the People’s Republic of China on 27 November 2019.  It called for feedback from the public and other interested stakeholders. This draft law aims to consolidate the reforms and […]

January 20, 2020
BevAlc Roundup | California Proposes Expanding Bottle Bill Rules, Opportunity in a Slowing-Growth Market, and Looking Back on Prohibition

2020 marks 100 years since the start of the Prohibition Era (the Volstead Act, which implemented the 18th Amendment, and prohibited the sale and production of any product with more than 0.5 percent ABV, came into effect on January 17, 1920). As such, there has been a lot of coverage in the media of this […]