Location Location Location

Elliot Shulver
September 5, 2019

EU and local legislation

Location of risk is one of the key criteria an insurer must identify and consider before thinking about insurance premium taxes. It’s important to understand the location of risk rules and apply them correctly to be able to settle insurance premium taxes compliantly and to the correct tax authority. Whilst location of risk rules can be complex, the rules set out in the EU Solvency II directive make it more straightforward for insurers to assign the location of risk on certain insurance risks such as stationary property or loss of profits.

It is less straightforward to apply the location of risk rules to other insurance risks such as long-term health cover of individuals who may relocate to another country, or marine hull coverage of a fleet of vessels operating across multiple territories. These are prime examples of some of the more complex issues and challenges in EU insurance premium tax compliance, where the relevant local premium tax legislation must be carefully scrutinised and interpreted in order to be confident of compliance.

Classifying easier risk types

Identifying the location of risk within the EU can range from clear cut to very challenging depending on the type of risk covered. Building insurance, for example, should follow the first rule detailed in article 13 (13) of the Solvency II directive, which quite simply states that the risk is situated where the building is situated. This rule also extends to buildings contents insurance, even where the building and its contents are not covered by the same policy. The only exception to this rule is in relation to commercial goods in transit coverage.

Increasing challenges

As we know, insurance premium tax is not harmonised and there can be grey areas when talking about certain types of insurance. Insurance of vehicles could be one of the problem areas due to the varied definitions of “vehicles of any kind” within local legislation. Industry practice usually includes land vehicles, aircraft and ships as types of vehicles, however, there are some instances where not just types of transport may be classed as vehicles. Interestingly, in the UK, offshore oil and gas installations which are designed to be moved from place to place should be regarded for location of risk purposes as ships.

Specific issues

Marine policies where ships travel across multiple EU territories can make it difficult for insurers to determine the location of risk. Problems arise when considering marine insurance in the territory of Malta. Maltese legislation specifically defines a “vehicle” as a motor vehicle as such in accordance with Maltese law. The interpretation of this Maltese legislation in respect of marine policies can therefore be debated as ships are not explicitly covered by the definition of a “vehicle”.

In addition, the insurance of ships should not follow a ship’s registration in Malta or the Maltese flag as more commonly considered across other EU jurisdictions. By that reasoning, the location of risk on marine insurance could be interpreted as in Malta if the policyholder is situated in Malta, even if the ship is not registered to Malta. This could create potential double taxation issues for a Maltese policyholder who has insured a vessel that is registered in Great Britain for example.

Understanding location of risk rules is crucial. To avoid potential double, or incorrect, taxation insurers must carefully analyse their insurance contracts and apply correct location of risk rules for the jurisdictions where they write insurance.

 

Take Action

To read more about the insurance landscape and tax compliance, download Trends: Insurance Premium Tax and follow us on LinkedIn and Twitter 

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Elliot Shulver

Elliot Shulver is a Manager, IPT compliance for indirect tax at Sovos. He joined the company in April 2014, having spent the previous two and a half years living and working in Australia and New Zealand. He is responsible for Gambling Duties, as well as researching and managing consultancy projects and technical knowledge for IPT.
Share This Post

Tax Compliance Tax Information Reporting United States
February 19, 2020
IRS Agrees to more Clarity on Crypto Information Reporting

The Government Accountability Office (GAO), a U.S. Congress watchdog, published a report evaluating the IRS’s approach to regulating virtual currency (crypto) and the guidance it has offered the public. In the report, the GAO offered three recommendations for the IRS, and an additional recommendation for the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), a bureau of the […]

Asia Pacific E-Invoicing Compliance VAT & Fiscal Reporting
February 19, 2020
India: Standardizing Business-to-Business E-invoice Exchange

With little over a month left to go before the first phase of Indian invoice clearance reform goes live, authorities are still busy finalizing the technical framework and infrastructure to support it. Just a few days ago, changes were made to the explanatory schema of the JSON file that will report data to the tax […]

Asia Pacific Brazil Colombia E-Invoicing Compliance EMEA Italy LATAM Mexico Sales & Use Tax Spain United States VAT & Fiscal Reporting
February 17, 2020
From Alignment to Action: Transforming tax compliance on your terms

What’s your digital transformation strategy? Whether you’re in IT, finance, tax or the executive suite, if that strategy doesn’t include tax, you may be overlooking a huge source of risk – and strategic benefit. It’s time to consider launching a conversation about tax in a digitally transforming world. Which is why we’ve created the “Yes, […]

Asia Pacific Brazil Colombia E-Invoicing Compliance EMEA Italy LATAM Mexico Sales & Use Tax Spain United States VAT & Fiscal Reporting
February 17, 2020
Aligning ERP and Tax: What’s the enterprise upside of tax compliance modernization?

What’s your digital transformation strategy? Whether you’re in IT, finance, tax or the executive suite, if that strategy doesn’t include tax, you may be overlooking a huge source of risk – and strategic benefit. It’s time to consider launching a conversation about tax in a digitally transforming world. Which is why we’ve created the “Yes, […]

Asia Pacific Brazil Colombia E-Invoicing Compliance EMEA Italy LATAM Mexico Sales & Use Tax Spain United States VAT & Fiscal Reporting
February 17, 2020
Tax & IT: How a Unified Compliance Vision Streamlines Digital Transformation

What’s your digital transformation strategy? Whether you’re in IT, finance, tax or the executive suite, if that strategy doesn’t include tax, you may be overlooking a huge source of risk – and strategic benefit. It’s time to consider launching a conversation about tax in a digitally transforming world. Which is why we’ve created the “Yes, […]