New Regulation Reinforces Free Flow of Data in the EU

Alicja Kwiatkowski
July 10, 2019

When thinking about the aim of GDPR, one of the first things that comes to mind is the set of rules, obligations, and restrictions on the processing of personal data. When in fact, as the full title of GDPR – General Data Protection Regulation – and its recitals explain, the subject matter and purpose of this regulation is not only the protection of personal data of natural persons but also the free flow of such data.

GDPRRegulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation).

To further increase the cross-border exchange of data and boost the data economy in Europe, the European Union have adopted another regulation, which supplements GDPR with respect to non-personal data. The Free Flow of Non-Personal Data Regulation (FFNPDR) became effective from May 28, 2019 – one year after GDPR.

FFNPDR– Regulation (EU) 2018/1807 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 November 2018 on a framework for the free flow of non-personal data in the European Union (The Free Flow of Non-Personal Data Regulation).

The FFNPDR introduces the principles of free movement of data and prohibits data localisation requirements within the EU, including indirect measures such as certification of local providers. It also establishes co-operation to ensure local authorities have sufficient access to data stored in other countries. Lastly, it provides incentives for data portability through codes of conduct.

This recent regulation also applies to mixed datasets, in other words documents containing both personal and non-personal data. In case of any conflict between the FFNPDR and GDPR, the latter takes precedence.

It is worth mentioning that the regulation has implications for the future as it will not affect current localisation requirements in the EU or its Member States’ legislation in effect prior to May 2019. Taking invoicing as an example, EU Member States may still need to notify local tax authorities about their intention to archive invoices in another EU country. Similar obligations may no longer be introduced in new legislation.

The clear aim of the FFNPDR is to create legal certainty for businesses to process their data wherever they want in the EU. It certainly raises trust in data processing services, such as digital archives, from other EU countries.

Take Action

Sovos Trustweaver provides eArchiving solutions for clients in over 50 countries. Find out more and follow us on LinkedIn and Twitter to keep up-to-date with regulatory news and other updates.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Alicja Kwiatkowski

Alicja Kwiatkowski is a Legal Counsel at Sovos TrustWeaver. Based in Stockholm, Alicja’s background is in law and IT with a professional focus on international e-invoicing compliance, personal data protection and cyber security. Alicja earned her degree in Law from University of Warsaw, Poland and LL.M in European IP Law from Stockholm University, Sweden.
Share This Post

Sales & Use Tax United States
August 22, 2019
Benefits of Sales Tax Automation Software and Deployment Options

You operate a lean tax compliance and reporting team. Maybe your company has reduced staff over the past 5-10 years while continuing to grow its business through organic means as well as merger and acquisition.  But now your staff of 10 is down to four or five. What was once a manageable manual process of […]

Tax Information Reporting United States
August 19, 2019
Negative Reporting – What If I Have No Records to Report?

If you have no new unclaimed property records for a particular state this filing year, does that mean you are off the hook? Well, not necessarily.   Most states want you to file with them each year. If you’ve reported in the past, they want to hear from you even in the years when you […]

Tax Information Reporting United States
August 19, 2019
To Aggregate or Not to Aggregate – There Is No Question – Not

Article written By Bill Dadmun, Records and Receipts Manager, State of Virginia   How many of you use the aggregate function when reporting?  Does it make your life easier?  Listen to this scenario and tell me if it sounds familiar.   You get a call from someone that is due $49.95 from a credit balance.  […]

Tax Information Reporting United States
August 19, 2019
Reciprocal Filing – Why You Should Proceed with Extreme Caution

This isn’t the first time I’ve blogged about the dangers of reciprocal filing, but I feel like it is a topic worth covering again for those who may have missed it. Reciprocal or exchange filing means reporting records to a state even though the last known addresses for the records are not in that state. […]

Tax Information Reporting United States
August 19, 2019
Demystifying Codes for Unclaimed Property Compliance

Have you ever been confused about which property code to use for a certain type of property? We have all been there. NAUPA, the National Association of Unclaimed Property Administrators, has a list of standard codes that you can view here starting at the bottom of page 23.   Each code is made up of two alpha […]