Interpreting Insurance Tax Legislation

Alessia Mecozzi
July 9, 2019

Tax legislation is sometimes structured, or worded, ambiguously.  This leaves scope for a number of different interpretations for the treatment of tax on insurance policies, some leading to a lower tax liability than others.

This can often be seen when different insurance premium tax (IPT) rates apply to specific sub-classes of the same business or when the policy covers particular risks that may trigger the application of parafiscal charges – such as motor levies, fire brigade charges, and contributions on terrorism risks.  The challenge in identifying the correct tax treatment can also sometimes lie in the complexity of non-IPT related legislation governing which type of cover is to be provided.

Even across the “harmonised” member states of the European Union, IPT treatments are fragmented and diverse.  The rates in themselves vary greatly and an exemption applicable in one territory does not necessarily apply in another.  These points alone add to the complexity and challenges when interpreting local tax laws.

A further challenge concerns language.  The technicalities of both tax and insurance terminology can be a minefield for translations.  For example, the difference between insurance, warranties, guarantees and sureties can be subtle, but getting the translation wrong can be the difference between a product being taxed or not. 

In the world of IPT, where the rates and charges applied have a direct or indirect impact on the premium charged to the client, choosing one interpretation over another may affect the insurer’s competitiveness in the marketplace.  As pressures mount to protect profit margins, applying the right rates of IPT can have a significant impact on the business

Common practices have developed within the insurance industry to provide more clarity and official interpretations over grey areas concerning the application of IPT across the EU.  An insurer may decide to follow an approach that is more compliant than market practice but that could result in a greater tax liability.  As a result, the premiums in this scenario are likely to be higher than its competitors.  This will therefore have a negative impact on the business with clients moving to what may appear to be a cheaper policy.

If the market interpretation is followed, there is however a risk that the tax authorities disagree with it during an audit and consider it to be non-compliant.  In some countries, it is possible for the taxpayer to seek an official interpretation over the tax treatment of a specific transaction directly from the tax authorities.  However, in some cases, clarifications must be sought in advance of offering the insurance product and the delay in obtaining the answer could result in a loss of revenue for the insurer.  It may also be the case that the interpretation provided by the authorities is binding only for the taxpayer requesting it.  This leaves the insurer with the burden of informing the market in order to preserve its competitiveness.

The world of IPT compliance is complex and the consequences of incorrectly interpreting the legislation can be far reaching.  Local knowledge and experience are key.


Take Action

To read more about the insurance landscape and tax compliance, download Trends: Insurance Premium Tax and follow us on LinkedIn and Twitter 

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.


Alessia Mecozzi

Alessia is a Compliance Services Manager. She leads one of the insurance premium tax Managed Services Teams and is actively involved in managing client accounts. After graduating in Business and Management in Italy, she moved to the UK and joined Sovos FiscalReps in 2013, where she qualified as an accountant in 2018. She has over five years of experience in premium taxes across all European territories and is the subject matter expert in Italian and San Marino premium taxes.
Share This Post

Tax Information Reporting United States
October 21, 2019
Cryptocurrency Exchanges Serious about 1099 Reporting Despite Incomplete IRS Guidance

Ron Quaranta is founder and chairman of Wall Street Blockchain Alliance, the world’s leading non-profit trade association promoting the comprehensive adoption of blockchain technology and crypto assets across global financial markets. He will speak at the GCS Intelligent Reporting conference in San Antonio later this month. Ron spoke with Sovos recently about cryptocurrency tax regulations […]

Tax Compliance Tax Information Reporting United States
October 17, 2019
Unclaimed Property Reporting: Well Begun Is Half Done!

If you have ever had a child wait until the night before an assignment is due to ask for help, or had a client push a deadline as far back as possible to start, you know the frustration of rushed and ineffective project completion. With your unclaimed property reporting process, you can reduce this last-minute […]

Brazil E-Invoicing Compliance Tax Compliance
October 17, 2019
Brazil Implements New E-Invoice Type NF3e

Brazil is often viewed as one of the most complex tax jurisdictions in the world.  But, at the same time, it has been very successful in automating tax authority controls, and in doing so has replaced paper invoices with electronic invoices automating their exchange through clearance platforms. While the ambitious Brazilian plans to simplify the […]

Tax Information Reporting United States
October 16, 2019
Are You Considering Outsourcing Your Unclaimed Property Processes?

Managing an organization’s unclaimed property can be a full-time job. With the complexities of regulatory requirements, the numerous due diligence and dormancy tracking rules by property type and state, along with due diligence requirements, also varying by state, record retention needs in case of an audit, as well as reporting to multiple states, the process […]

Asia Pacific E-Invoicing Compliance
October 16, 2019
India Adds Clarity to New E-Invoicing Regime

Following India’s recent public consultation looking at the proposed introduction of an e-invoicing regime, the GST council has now released a white paper on the architecture of the new framework and also provided answers to a number of outstanding questions. From 1 January 2020, taxpayers in India can start to use the new e-invoicing framework, […]