Interpreting Insurance Tax Legislation

Alessia Mecozzi
July 9, 2019

Tax legislation is sometimes structured, or worded, ambiguously.  This leaves scope for a number of different interpretations for the treatment of tax on insurance policies, some leading to a lower tax liability than others.

This can often be seen when different insurance premium tax (IPT) rates apply to specific sub-classes of the same business or when the policy covers particular risks that may trigger the application of parafiscal charges – such as motor levies, fire brigade charges, and contributions on terrorism risks.  The challenge in identifying the correct tax treatment can also sometimes lie in the complexity of non-IPT related legislation governing which type of cover is to be provided.

Even across the “harmonised” member states of the European Union, IPT treatments are fragmented and diverse.  The rates in themselves vary greatly and an exemption applicable in one territory does not necessarily apply in another.  These points alone add to the complexity and challenges when interpreting local tax laws.

A further challenge concerns language.  The technicalities of both tax and insurance terminology can be a minefield for translations.  For example, the difference between insurance, warranties, guarantees and sureties can be subtle, but getting the translation wrong can be the difference between a product being taxed or not. 

In the world of IPT, where the rates and charges applied have a direct or indirect impact on the premium charged to the client, choosing one interpretation over another may affect the insurer’s competitiveness in the marketplace.  As pressures mount to protect profit margins, applying the right rates of IPT can have a significant impact on the business

Common practices have developed within the insurance industry to provide more clarity and official interpretations over grey areas concerning the application of IPT across the EU.  An insurer may decide to follow an approach that is more compliant than market practice but that could result in a greater tax liability.  As a result, the premiums in this scenario are likely to be higher than its competitors.  This will therefore have a negative impact on the business with clients moving to what may appear to be a cheaper policy.

If the market interpretation is followed, there is however a risk that the tax authorities disagree with it during an audit and consider it to be non-compliant.  In some countries, it is possible for the taxpayer to seek an official interpretation over the tax treatment of a specific transaction directly from the tax authorities.  However, in some cases, clarifications must be sought in advance of offering the insurance product and the delay in obtaining the answer could result in a loss of revenue for the insurer.  It may also be the case that the interpretation provided by the authorities is binding only for the taxpayer requesting it.  This leaves the insurer with the burden of informing the market in order to preserve its competitiveness.

The world of IPT compliance is complex and the consequences of incorrectly interpreting the legislation can be far reaching.  Local knowledge and experience are key.


Take Action

To read more about the insurance landscape and tax compliance, download Trends: Insurance Premium Tax and follow us on LinkedIn and Twitter 

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.


Alessia Mecozzi

Alessia is a Compliance Services Manager. She leads one of the insurance premium tax Managed Services Teams and is actively involved in managing client accounts. After graduating in Business and Management in Italy, she moved to the UK and joined Sovos FiscalReps in 2013, where she qualified as an accountant in 2018. She has over five years of experience in premium taxes across all European territories and is the subject matter expert in Italian and San Marino premium taxes.
Share This Post

Sales & Use Tax United States
August 22, 2019
Benefits of Sales Tax Automation Software and Deployment Options

You operate a lean tax compliance and reporting team. Maybe your company has reduced staff over the past 5-10 years while continuing to grow its business through organic means as well as merger and acquisition.  But now your staff of 10 is down to four or five. What was once a manageable manual process of […]

Tax Information Reporting United States
August 19, 2019
Negative Reporting – What If I Have No Records to Report?

If you have no new unclaimed property records for a particular state this filing year, does that mean you are off the hook? Well, not necessarily.   Most states want you to file with them each year. If you’ve reported in the past, they want to hear from you even in the years when you […]

Tax Information Reporting United States
August 19, 2019
To Aggregate or Not to Aggregate – There Is No Question – Not

Article written By Bill Dadmun, Records and Receipts Manager, State of Virginia   How many of you use the aggregate function when reporting?  Does it make your life easier?  Listen to this scenario and tell me if it sounds familiar.   You get a call from someone that is due $49.95 from a credit balance.  […]

Tax Information Reporting United States
August 19, 2019
Reciprocal Filing – Why You Should Proceed with Extreme Caution

This isn’t the first time I’ve blogged about the dangers of reciprocal filing, but I feel like it is a topic worth covering again for those who may have missed it. Reciprocal or exchange filing means reporting records to a state even though the last known addresses for the records are not in that state. […]

Tax Information Reporting United States
August 19, 2019
Demystifying Codes for Unclaimed Property Compliance

Have you ever been confused about which property code to use for a certain type of property? We have all been there. NAUPA, the National Association of Unclaimed Property Administrators, has a list of standard codes that you can view here starting at the bottom of page 23.   Each code is made up of two alpha […]