Interpreting Insurance Tax Legislation

Alessia Mecozzi
July 9, 2019

Tax legislation is sometimes structured, or worded, ambiguously.  This leaves scope for a number of different interpretations for the treatment of tax on insurance policies, some leading to a lower tax liability than others.

This can often be seen when different insurance premium tax (IPT) rates apply to specific sub-classes of the same business or when the policy covers particular risks that may trigger the application of parafiscal charges – such as motor levies, fire brigade charges, and contributions on terrorism risks.  The challenge in identifying the correct tax treatment can also sometimes lie in the complexity of non-IPT related legislation governing which type of cover is to be provided.

Even across the “harmonised” member states of the European Union, IPT treatments are fragmented and diverse.  The rates in themselves vary greatly and an exemption applicable in one territory does not necessarily apply in another.  These points alone add to the complexity and challenges when interpreting local tax laws.

A further challenge concerns language.  The technicalities of both tax and insurance terminology can be a minefield for translations.  For example, the difference between insurance, warranties, guarantees and sureties can be subtle, but getting the translation wrong can be the difference between a product being taxed or not. 

In the world of IPT, where the rates and charges applied have a direct or indirect impact on the premium charged to the client, choosing one interpretation over another may affect the insurer’s competitiveness in the marketplace.  As pressures mount to protect profit margins, applying the right rates of IPT can have a significant impact on the business

Common practices have developed within the insurance industry to provide more clarity and official interpretations over grey areas concerning the application of IPT across the EU.  An insurer may decide to follow an approach that is more compliant than market practice but that could result in a greater tax liability.  As a result, the premiums in this scenario are likely to be higher than its competitors.  This will therefore have a negative impact on the business with clients moving to what may appear to be a cheaper policy.

If the market interpretation is followed, there is however a risk that the tax authorities disagree with it during an audit and consider it to be non-compliant.  In some countries, it is possible for the taxpayer to seek an official interpretation over the tax treatment of a specific transaction directly from the tax authorities.  However, in some cases, clarifications must be sought in advance of offering the insurance product and the delay in obtaining the answer could result in a loss of revenue for the insurer.  It may also be the case that the interpretation provided by the authorities is binding only for the taxpayer requesting it.  This leaves the insurer with the burden of informing the market in order to preserve its competitiveness.

The world of IPT compliance is complex and the consequences of incorrectly interpreting the legislation can be far reaching.  Local knowledge and experience are key.


Take Action

To read more about the insurance landscape and tax compliance, download Trends: Insurance Premium Tax and follow us on LinkedIn and Twitter 

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.


Alessia Mecozzi

Alessia is a Compliance Services Manager. She leads one of the insurance premium tax Managed Services Teams and is actively involved in managing client accounts. After graduating in Business and Management in Italy, she moved to the UK and joined Sovos FiscalReps in 2013, where she qualified as an accountant in 2018. She has over five years of experience in premium taxes across all European territories and is the subject matter expert in Italian and San Marino premium taxes.
Share This Post

LATAM VAT & Fiscal Reporting
May 20, 2020
Sovos Acquires Taxweb, Extends Tax Determination Capabilities in World’s Most Challenging Compliance Landscape

Earlier this month Sovos announced its second acquisition of 2020, completing our solution for Brazil with an unparalleled offering that solves tax compliance in the place where it is most challenging to do so.  Too many companies doing business in Brazil have been burdened by managing multiple point solutions for continuous transaction controls (CTCs), tax […]

ShipCompliant United States
July 2, 2020
Direct Wine Shippers Have a New Tax Burden in Chicago

As of July 1, 2020, wineries making direct-to-consumer (DtC) shipments of wine into the city of Chicago will face an additional tax burden. Under Chicago ordinance O2020-801, the city’s Liquor Tax will now apply to all sales of alcohol to consumers in the city.  What Is The Chicago Liquor Tax? Chicago has long imposed an […]

Tax Compliance Tax Information Reporting United States
July 2, 2020
New Educational Course: Tax Compliance and Accounting for Captive Insurers

Finding relevant insurance accounting education has always been a challenge for insurance professionals. Insurance is a global industry. But, the financial reporting and tax rules for insurance transactions represent only a small niche within the extensive realm of statutory and GAAP guidance.  Captive insurance companies are yet another niche within that, which only narrows the […]

Sales & Use Tax United States
July 1, 2020
New Rules for Remote Sellers in Louisiana

Beginning July 1, remote sellers making sales into Louisiana must register with the Louisiana Sales and Use Tax Commission for Remote Sellers (“the Commission”) in order to be compliant with new requirements to collect, remit and report state and local sales tax. The information below is intended to explain what companies will be impacted, what […]

Sales & Use Tax United States
July 1, 2020
Back to Basics: Seven Things You Need to Know About CSPs & SST

Sales & Use Tax is complex and growing more so by the day. The number of jurisdictions, tax forms and rate changes makes managing these processes enough to deplete the resources of even the most experienced accounting and finance teams.  States have been working to alleviate the burden on companies by providing programs that allow […]

EMEA Tax Compliance VAT & Fiscal Reporting
July 1, 2020
Digital Services Tax Debate Intensifies

On 18 June 2020 European officials announced that an EU-wide digital services tax (DST) will be introduced if the US’s recent withdrawal from global tax negotiations stops international agreement. The US’s withdrawal follows the United States Trade Representative’s (USTR) initiation of Section 301 investigations into DSTs adopted or proposed in the EU and nine countries. […]