Under the Bonnet of Motor Insurance

Elliot Shulver
July 3, 2019

When it comes to motor insurance, everything is high; high tax rates, high volumes of tax administration and high levels of complexity.  A thorough understanding and the implications of each is key to tax compliance.

High rates

Motor insurance claims the title of the highest premium tax rate in Europe. The Danish tax on motor third party liability insurance comes in at a substantial 42.9% of premium. If this were not enough, an insurer may have to “top up” their tax payment to the minimum contribution of 47.2% of the value of their claims if this is higher than the tax already paid. The overall rate applied on French motor third party liability insurance is also high at 35%, although it is divided into three distinct taxes. The only premium tax on non-life insurance for Swedes is on motor third-party liability insurance and is currently 32%.

The tax rate on motor premiums is almost always greater and never lower when compared to the taxes due on general liability premiums across the EU. In fact, the average premium tax rate for general liability insurance is just under 8%, but the average rate for third-party motor liability is nearly double this at 14%.

High compliance

The premium tax requirements on motor insurance are extremely onerous, as are the regulatory conditions imposed on this highly controlled industry. Motor insurance incurs more premium taxes and parafiscal fees than any other business line. For instance, Belgium’s general liability premiums are subject to one premium tax with 12 tax returns being due throughout the year. However, a Belgian motor risk insurer will have to file 48 distinct tax returns covering 4 distinct taxes in the same period. In Portugal, where the numbers are 14 vs. 30 this tale is repeated.

High complexity

Because of the number of taxes applicable, calculating taxes on motor insurance business is more complex than for many other business lines. While general liability programs across Europe will be subject to approximately 25 separate taxes, the corresponding motor figure is double this at 50, all with distinct rates, regulations and deadlines, and all with the potential for change. Calculating the tax accurately may depend more than any other line of business on high-quality policy data.

In some cases, the location where the vehicle is registered in the country is required. In Italy, each of the 110 Italian provinces has the power to set their own insurance premium tax rate on third-party motor liability premiums written in relation to vehicles registered there. When the car is stored in the inner London Boroughs, motor-own damage policies in the UK can incur an extra tax. And, details of the type of car to be covered are needed in some regions. Belgian tax rates may differ if the car is used for business or private use and the car is within certain weight limits. In Austria, the calculation of the vehicle insurance tax requires information on the power of the vehicle’s engine in kilowatts.

Each of these “highs” illustrate the need for accuracy and when combined, the potential risks for insurers are compounded. The high rates imply that a mistake can be expensive impacting profit margins; the high complexity means that a mistake is far more likely to occur; and the likelihood of errors rises due to the increased number of taxes. However, it is possible to reduce and manage the risks with thorough product evaluation and coding and the administration can be simplified with a considered and coherent approach.

Take Action

To read more about the insurance landscape and tax compliance, download Trends: Insurance Premium Tax and follow us on LinkedIn and Twitter 

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Elliot Shulver

Elliot Shulver is a client manager for indirect tax at Sovos. He joined the company in April 2014, having spent the previous two and a half years living and working in Australia and New Zealand. He is responsible for Gambling Duties, as well as researching and managing consultancy projects and technical knowledge for IPT.
Share This Post

Tax Information Reporting United States
October 21, 2019
Cryptocurrency Exchanges Serious about 1099 Reporting Despite Incomplete IRS Guidance

Ron Quaranta is founder and chairman of Wall Street Blockchain Alliance, the world’s leading non-profit trade association promoting the comprehensive adoption of blockchain technology and crypto assets across global financial markets. He will speak at the GCS Intelligent Reporting conference in San Antonio later this month. Ron spoke with Sovos recently about cryptocurrency tax regulations […]

Tax Compliance Tax Information Reporting United States
October 17, 2019
Unclaimed Property Reporting: Well Begun Is Half Done!

If you have ever had a child wait until the night before an assignment is due to ask for help, or had a client push a deadline as far back as possible to start, you know the frustration of rushed and ineffective project completion. With your unclaimed property reporting process, you can reduce this last-minute […]

Brazil E-Invoicing Compliance Tax Compliance
October 17, 2019
Brazil Implements New E-Invoice Type NF3e

Brazil is often viewed as one of the most complex tax jurisdictions in the world.  But, at the same time, it has been very successful in automating tax authority controls, and in doing so has replaced paper invoices with electronic invoices automating their exchange through clearance platforms. While the ambitious Brazilian plans to simplify the […]

Tax Information Reporting United States
October 16, 2019
Are You Considering Outsourcing Your Unclaimed Property Processes?

Managing an organization’s unclaimed property can be a full-time job. With the complexities of regulatory requirements, the numerous due diligence and dormancy tracking rules by property type and state, along with due diligence requirements, also varying by state, record retention needs in case of an audit, as well as reporting to multiple states, the process […]

Asia Pacific E-Invoicing Compliance
October 16, 2019
India Adds Clarity to New E-Invoicing Regime

Following India’s recent public consultation looking at the proposed introduction of an e-invoicing regime, the GST council has now released a white paper on the architecture of the new framework and also provided answers to a number of outstanding questions. From 1 January 2020, taxpayers in India can start to use the new e-invoicing framework, […]