Knowing When and How to Reclaim IPT

Elliot Shulver
June 13, 2019

An insurer may need to reclaim insurance premium tax (IPT) from a tax authority for many reasons. These include a policy cancellation or mid-term adjustment, an administrative error or issuing a no claims bonus. In each case, it’s important to be aware of the issues involved ahead of any reclaim to ensure taxes are recovered in the most efficient way.

Cancellations of insurance policies and mid-term adjustments can trigger premium refunds to policyholders, but this doesn’t necessarily result in an IPT credit. Many, if not most, insurance tax regimes will allow the an IPT refund on returned premiums, but insurers shouldn’t assume this applies to all premium tax regimes. Most taxes collected by way of a fixed fee, such as France’s Victims of Terrorism Solidarity Fund and Irish Stamp Duty, will only be refunded if the contract is fully cancelled; if the contract was on risk for any period, a refund will not be made.

Countries that charge Stamp Duty on insurance, such as Cyprus and Malta, often don’t allow refunds after a certain cooling off period on the same principle. One of the most expensive regimes where an IPT refund isn’t due on a contract cancellation is Italy, where a simple fire or liability contract incurs non-refundable insurance taxes at an effective rate of 22.25%.

Even when a jurisdiction permits a refund, the insurer will normally need to prove that any IPT recovered from the tax authorities is passed back to the policyholder. An insurer should understand the variances in reclaim methods and the ability to make a successful reclaim.

Dealing with cancellations

The most common method of dealing with cancellations is to process them through the current return, i.e. where a return premium is processed, that amount of premium is netted off against the declared received premium for the same period. This is accepted in Germany and Finland for example, although there are variances with Germany requiring the returned premiums be declared separately in the return and in Finland just the net amount is reported. It’s vital the taxpayer captures and includes cancellations in the correct reporting period as any undue delay could result in the correction of an error instead.

How to handle corrections

The correction of an error due to an overstated return may be due to several reasons, such as, an administrative error or applying an incorrect tax treatment. The process to correct these types of error, of course, varies by territory.  Some follow the same approach as cancellations – i.e. through the current return, either with prior permission from the tax authorities or within certain limits.  Some, such as the German authorities, request a resubmission of a return, whilst others require a more thorough approach, including a detailed explanation of how the error arose, measures taken to prevent future errors and, in some cases, copies of the accounting ledgers. The UK take a hybrid approach. Within specified thresholds, certain errors can be corrected through the current return, but where corrections are outside these thresholds, a voluntary disclosure letter is required explaining the reason for the error and the corrective measures taken.

Constant error corrections run the risk of the taxpayer becoming an audit target for a tax authority. This could have consequences for IPT but also much wider tax implications.

An insurer may offer a no claims bonus to policyholders either at the end of the policy period, or an upfront discount on the renewal premium.  Again, the treatment for this type of premium refund varies by territory. In Germany, an IPT refund isn’t possible where the risk is fully subscribed. This means that offering a policyholder a refund on a contract due to no or low claims being made wouldn’t qualify for an IPT credit no claims bonus. This contrasts with the Netherlands, where a credit for IPT would generally be permitted, as they consider a no claims bonus as a refund of premium to the policyholder.

It’s important for insurers to be aware that when returning a premium to a policyholder, it doesn’t automatically mean the tax authority will refund the IPT paid. It can be beneficial for the insurer to understand the reclaim rules in the territories in which they operate to ensure efficient tax recovery and to maintain ongoing compliance.


Take Action

To read more about the insurance landscape, download Trends: Insurance Premium Tax and follow us on LinkedIn and Twitter 

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.


Elliot Shulver

Elliot Shulver is a client manager for indirect tax at Sovos. He joined the company in April 2014, having spent the previous two and a half years living and working in Australia and New Zealand. He is responsible for Gambling Duties, as well as researching and managing consultancy projects and technical knowledge for IPT.
Share This Post

Tax Information Reporting United States
October 21, 2019
Cryptocurrency Exchanges Serious about 1099 Reporting Despite Incomplete IRS Guidance

Ron Quaranta is founder and chairman of Wall Street Blockchain Alliance, the world’s leading non-profit trade association promoting the comprehensive adoption of blockchain technology and crypto assets across global financial markets. He will speak at the GCS Intelligent Reporting conference in San Antonio later this month. Ron spoke with Sovos recently about cryptocurrency tax regulations […]

Tax Compliance Tax Information Reporting United States
October 17, 2019
Unclaimed Property Reporting: Well Begun Is Half Done!

If you have ever had a child wait until the night before an assignment is due to ask for help, or had a client push a deadline as far back as possible to start, you know the frustration of rushed and ineffective project completion. With your unclaimed property reporting process, you can reduce this last-minute […]

Brazil E-Invoicing Compliance Tax Compliance
October 17, 2019
Brazil Implements New E-Invoice Type NF3e

Brazil is often viewed as one of the most complex tax jurisdictions in the world.  But, at the same time, it has been very successful in automating tax authority controls, and in doing so has replaced paper invoices with electronic invoices automating their exchange through clearance platforms. While the ambitious Brazilian plans to simplify the […]

Tax Information Reporting United States
October 16, 2019
Are You Considering Outsourcing Your Unclaimed Property Processes?

Managing an organization’s unclaimed property can be a full-time job. With the complexities of regulatory requirements, the numerous due diligence and dormancy tracking rules by property type and state, along with due diligence requirements, also varying by state, record retention needs in case of an audit, as well as reporting to multiple states, the process […]

Asia Pacific E-Invoicing Compliance
October 16, 2019
India Adds Clarity to New E-Invoicing Regime

Following India’s recent public consultation looking at the proposed introduction of an e-invoicing regime, the GST council has now released a white paper on the architecture of the new framework and also provided answers to a number of outstanding questions. From 1 January 2020, taxpayers in India can start to use the new e-invoicing framework, […]