Italian Prepayments Can Be Painful

Alessia Mecozzi
May 2, 2019

Some insurance premium tax regimes operate a kind of prepayment mechanism, whereby insurers are required to pay an amount to the tax authorities in anticipation of future tax liabilities.  This credit is then drawn down on or adjusted as and when actual tax liabilities crystallise.  Prepayment should not, therefore, represent an additional cost to insurance transactions, but they can pose some cash flow considerations for insurers.  In some cases, insurers can be required to hand over significant amounts of money to the tax office who will hold those amounts, in some cases for several years.

Of the half dozen or so prepayment mechanisms across Europe, no two are the same in their process or impact.  Perhaps the most prominent of these is that of the Italian IPT prepayment; prominent because not only does it apply to all insurers writing non-life insurance risks in Italy, but also because of its size.  Whilst the current rate set last year is 58% of the previous year’s total IPT and anti-racket contributions, it will increase to 100% in a few years’ time, meaning that in November 2021, insurers will need to pay the total of their 2020 tax bill to the Italian tax office again.  Throughout the following year, the insurer draws down on this prepayment so they do not need to make additional payments to the tax office until the prepaid amount is exhausted. 

The impact that the Brexit vote has had on the London market has brought the Italian prepayment in to sharp focus for many UK insurers, as they wind down their Italian exposures and start underwriting Italian risks through EU based subsidiaries. 

Where insurance companies have merged, the credit with the tax authorities is transferred to the resulting company together with all the assets and liabilities. Transferring the prepayment to the transferee in the case of a portfolio transfer is still however a grey area. If the consulting department of the Italian tax authorities have agreed in principle with the prepayment transfer, then an official ruling must be submitted to obtain an interpretation which is binding for the tax authorities. Even though this would provide some clarity, it may still take months for the ruling to be drawn and published, and there is always the risk of an adverse outcome. In the meantime, the transferring company is out of pocket. Even if the transfer of the prepayment credit is allowed, the receiving company needs to agree to reimburse the IPT prepayments.

If the prepayment is not transferred together with the portfolio, it could still be reclaimed from the Italian authorities.  This would only apply if the insurer has withdrawn its passport thereby ensuring that the credit will not be used in the future. This is not a quick process though, with reimbursements often being released over a year after the reclaim submission.

But the problems caused by the prepayment will affect any insurer exiting the Italian market or even just reducing their Italian business. 

For any tax registrations not cancelled prior to the next deadline in November 2019, the insurer must pay the prepayment for 2020 which equates to 85% of their 2018 IPT and anti-racket contribution liabilities. A ruling made years ago by the Italian tax authorities has clarified that the prepayment is due on an historic basis and cannot be settled based on an estimate of future tax liabilities. So, if premiums were collected in 2018, resulting in IPT and anti-racket contributions being due, then the tax authorities will expect a prepayment for tax year 2020.

When an insurer is exiting Italy, be it due to Brexit or any other reason, clearly being aware of your current and ongoing prepayment obligations is key to minimising unnecessary pain in the future.

 

Take Action

To read more about the insurance landscape, download Trends: Insurance Premium Tax and follow us on LinkedIn and Twitter 

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Alessia Mecozzi

Alessia is a Compliance Services Manager. She leads one of the insurance premium tax Managed Services Teams and is actively involved in managing client accounts. After graduating in Business and Management in Italy, she moved to the UK and joined Sovos FiscalReps in 2013, where she qualified as an accountant in 2018. She has over five years of experience in premium taxes across all European territories and is the subject matter expert in Italian and San Marino premium taxes.
Share This Post

Colombia E-Invoicing Compliance LATAM
May 24, 2019
Colombia DIAN UBL 2.1 E-invoicing Mandate Reminds SAP Shops Why Compliance Matters

Colombia’s new electronic invoicing mandate serves as another reminder to SAP that compliance has to be at the heart of digital transformation efforts and migrations to SAP S/4HANA. The South American country, following the lead of Latin American neighbors Brazil and Mexico, is moving from a reporting e-invoicing model to a clearance model. Effectively, that means […]

Tax Information Reporting United States
May 24, 2019
TIGTA Audit Highlights Gaps in IRS Withholding Controls

The Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) reported results of a recent audit of the IRS internal controls in place to ensure that the withholding reported on information returns (i.e., Forms 1099) is accurately reflected on Form 945, Annual Return of Withheld Federal Income Tax, and that those amounts were paid to the IRS. […]

EMEA IPT
May 23, 2019
Key Reporting Considerations for Insurers Writing Insurance Across the EU

Freedom of services insurers are faced with a number of different obligations when entering new territories and writing insurance business within the European Union.  One that may initially be overlooked relates to which policy details are required to be recorded and then reported to the tax authorities.   It is essential that all insurance premium […]

E-Invoicing Compliance EMEA
May 23, 2019
Europe Embraces Digitized Invoices but Country Specific Requirements are Diverse

Based on the Billentis report of 2019 (The E-invoicing Journey 2019-2025), automated e-invoicing will generally result in cost savings of 60-80% compared to conventional paper format invoices. In this age of digital transformation, optimizing invoice flows is top of corporate agendas for most companies to improve efficiencies and reduce operating costs. And many companies want […]

Colombia E-Invoicing Compliance
May 22, 2019
Colombia anuncia el nuevo modelo de validación previa y el protocolo UBL 2.1 para su mandato de facturación electrónica

La autoridad fiscal de Colombia, DIAN (Dirección de Impuestos y Aduanas Nacionales), ha anunciado nuevos cambios a su mandato de facturación electrónica que serán implementados según la Resolución 020, orientada a las empresas que aún no han adoptado este modelo de facturación. Quienes ya son facturadores electrónicos deberán implementar el nuevo modelo antes del 2 […]