Italian Prepayments Can Be Painful

Alessia Mecozzi
May 2, 2019

Some insurance premium tax regimes operate a kind of prepayment mechanism, whereby insurers are required to pay an amount to the tax authorities in anticipation of future tax liabilities.  This credit is then drawn down on or adjusted as and when actual tax liabilities crystallise.  Prepayment should not, therefore, represent an additional cost to insurance transactions, but they can pose some cash flow considerations for insurers.  In some cases, insurers can be required to hand over significant amounts of money to the tax office who will hold those amounts, in some cases for several years.

Of the half dozen or so prepayment mechanisms across Europe, no two are the same in their process or impact.  Perhaps the most prominent of these is that of the Italian IPT prepayment; prominent because not only does it apply to all insurers writing non-life insurance risks in Italy, but also because of its size.  Whilst the current rate set last year is 58% of the previous year’s total IPT and anti-racket contributions, it will increase to 100% in a few years’ time, meaning that in November 2021, insurers will need to pay the total of their 2020 tax bill to the Italian tax office again.  Throughout the following year, the insurer draws down on this prepayment so they do not need to make additional payments to the tax office until the prepaid amount is exhausted. 

The impact that the Brexit vote has had on the London market has brought the Italian prepayment in to sharp focus for many UK insurers, as they wind down their Italian exposures and start underwriting Italian risks through EU based subsidiaries. 

Where insurance companies have merged, the credit with the tax authorities is transferred to the resulting company together with all the assets and liabilities. Transferring the prepayment to the transferee in the case of a portfolio transfer is still however a grey area. If the consulting department of the Italian tax authorities have agreed in principle with the prepayment transfer, then an official ruling must be submitted to obtain an interpretation which is binding for the tax authorities. Even though this would provide some clarity, it may still take months for the ruling to be drawn and published, and there is always the risk of an adverse outcome. In the meantime, the transferring company is out of pocket. Even if the transfer of the prepayment credit is allowed, the receiving company needs to agree to reimburse the IPT prepayments.

If the prepayment is not transferred together with the portfolio, it could still be reclaimed from the Italian authorities.  This would only apply if the insurer has withdrawn its passport thereby ensuring that the credit will not be used in the future. This is not a quick process though, with reimbursements often being released over a year after the reclaim submission.

But the problems caused by the prepayment will affect any insurer exiting the Italian market or even just reducing their Italian business. 

For any tax registrations not cancelled prior to the next deadline in November 2019, the insurer must pay the prepayment for 2020 which equates to 85% of their 2018 IPT and anti-racket contribution liabilities. A ruling made years ago by the Italian tax authorities has clarified that the prepayment is due on an historic basis and cannot be settled based on an estimate of future tax liabilities. So, if premiums were collected in 2018, resulting in IPT and anti-racket contributions being due, then the tax authorities will expect a prepayment for tax year 2020.

When an insurer is exiting Italy, be it due to Brexit or any other reason, clearly being aware of your current and ongoing prepayment obligations is key to minimising unnecessary pain in the future.

 

Take Action

To read more about the insurance landscape, download Trends: Insurance Premium Tax and follow us on LinkedIn and Twitter 

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Alessia Mecozzi

Alessia is a Compliance Services Manager. She leads one of the insurance premium tax Managed Services Teams and is actively involved in managing client accounts. After graduating in Business and Management in Italy, she moved to the UK and joined Sovos FiscalReps in 2013, where she qualified as an accountant in 2018. She has over five years of experience in premium taxes across all European territories and is the subject matter expert in Italian and San Marino premium taxes.
Share This Post

Tax Information Reporting United States
July 11, 2019
Why the IRS Needs to Release Cryptocurrency Tax Guidance

Despite IRS Commissioner Charles Rettig’s promise of “within the next 30 days” more than 30 days ago to Congress regarding the release of forthcoming cryptocurrency tax guidance, we have not seen anything materialize.  As we mentioned previously, the ongoing confusion related to tax reporting obligations continues to plague payers such as crypto or digital currency […]

EMEA Tax Compliance
July 10, 2019
New Regulation Reinforces Free Flow of Data in the EU

When thinking about the aim of GDPR, one of the first things that comes to mind is the set of rules, obligations, and restrictions on the processing of personal data. When in fact, as the full title of GDPR – General Data Protection Regulation – and its recitals explain, the subject matter and purpose of […]

E-Invoicing Compliance EMEA
July 10, 2019
Greek E-Invoicing Reform: Potential Impact of Recent National Elections

On 7 July, Greece began voting to elect a new government.  The disposed governing left party has been dealt with a hefty blow having been in power since 2015.  It was hoped they would introduce less severe politics which many claim they have not only failed to do but, in fact, they actually introduced stricter […]

Tax Information Reporting United States
July 9, 2019
The IRS Is Allowing TIN Masking on Form W-2. Here’s Why It’s a Good Idea

At last, the IRS is allowing payers to truncate, or effectively mask, tax identification numbers (TINs) on Forms W-2 sent to payees. The decision comes after years of concern from companies and taxpayers about the risk of exposing TINs, or Social Security Numbers in the case of individual payees, in W-2 distributions.  The new policy […]

EMEA IPT
July 9, 2019
Interpreting Insurance Tax Legislation

Tax legislation is sometimes structured, or worded, ambiguously.  This leaves scope for a number of different interpretations for the treatment of tax on insurance policies, some leading to a lower tax liability than others. This can often be seen when different insurance premium tax (IPT) rates apply to specific sub-classes of the same business or […]