Is Sales Tax Economic Nexus Simplification on the Horizon?

Alex Forbes
April 10, 2019

A topic of conversation on the recent Sovos and Deloitte Tax LLC webinar, “The Speed of Sales Tax – How to Stay Ahead of Changing Regulations in 2019,” was whether or not states will seek further economic nexus simplification.

State of sales tax economic nexus

Currently, there are 36 states enforcing sales tax economic nexus rules. While many of these states are streamlined sales tax (SST) states, a good number of them are not. Whether these non-SST states will be determined to create an undue burden still remains to be seen.

California began enforcement April 1, 2019, while Texas is holding out until October 2019. There are still eight states, including Arkansas [Update 4/12: Arkansas enacts economic nexus law], Arizona, Florida, Idaho, Kansas, Missouri, New Mexico and Virginia, without sales tax economic nexus rules. Those dominoes will fall eventually, whether this year or next, according to our webinar panel. For example, New Mexico House Bill 6 has been enacted and is scheduled to create economic nexus July 1, 2019. Virginia House Bill 1722, also scheduled to pass July 1, will create economic nexus there. Kanas, on the other hand, has a bill before the governor, but the panel is not confident it will have an economic nexus standard there in the immediate future, believing it will be vetoed.

In Missouri, a very complicated taxing jurisdiction, there are a number of bills currently being debated and the state may be working on something for this year, while Tennessee is still in litigation.

Remote seller nexus simplification on the horizon?

South Dakota created the standard of 200 transactions or $100,000 in gross sales as the barrier to trigger an economic nexus registration and collection requirement after the South Dakota v. Wayfair decision. Our panel reiterated that there’s no magic in those numbers, but when the first states started to enact an economic nexus standard, they used those same numbers, viewing them as a bit of a safe harbor even though they were never intended as one.

A few states that initially enacted a 200 transaction, $100,000 in gross sale threshold are in legislation this year looking to potentially change that threshold as they bolster their rules by statute. For example, California may be changing to a $500,000 threshold, while North Dakota and Washington are following a trend of eliminating the number of transactions threshold and going simply with a gross sale type standard.

When asked if the panel was seeing a trend of states eliminating the number of transactions when adopting Wayfair economic nexus rules, an example of where things become murky came readily to mind:

Not all states count the number of transactions and sales the same way. For most states, a gross sales number is used as a proxy for economic presence. Others will count only taxable sales, some just retail sales, which could create exclusions for a lot of companies. Kentucky counts sales of products and digital property but not necessarily services or anything else. Illinois counts product sales including exempt sales, but not exempt sales for resale.

Chuck Maniace, director of regulatory analysis, Sovos, sees this as a practical concern, meaning these states recognize that to register a taxpayer and to process their tax return every single month is not a completely substantial burden. They’re trying to exclude from this process those businesses that may technically have an obligation but may not be particularly fruitful in the amount of revenue they bring.

Washington state, where taxing is based on amounts of retail sales as part of legislation that eliminated the 200 transaction threshold, is going to be moving from gross receipts on retail sales to cumulative gross income on January 1, 2020.

For further details about remote seller nexus simplification, such as what Alabama, Colorado and Louisiana and doing, where there may be undue burden and places that are ripe for challenge, view the webinar recording and download the slides.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Alex Forbes

Alex Forbes is Senior Manager, Content Marketing, at Sovos. When not helping readers navigate their tax-related digital business transformation journeys, he enjoys day tripping around New England with his wife.
Share This Post

E-Invoicing Compliance
June 24, 2019
Indian GST Council Confirms Plan to Roll out B2B E-invoicing System

Last week, the Indian GST Council convened for its 35th session, this time chaired by the recently appointed finance minister, Nirmala Sitharaman. As expected, the topic of a nationwide mandatory B2B e-invoicing system was on the agenda, and the GST council confirmed two important principles: Scope: The e-invoicing system will cover only B2B transactions to […]

E-Invoicing Compliance Tax Compliance
June 20, 2019
Is India on a Path toward Mandatory B2B E-invoicing?

As more and more countries across the world depend on VAT, GST or other indirect taxes as the single most significant source of public revenue, governments are increasingly asking themselves what technical means they can use to ensure that they maximize the collection of the taxes due under the new tax regimes. India is the […]

E-Invoicing Compliance EMEA Italy VAT & Fiscal Reporting
June 20, 2019
From E-invoicing to E-ordering: New Mandate Coming to Italy in October

Italy has been at the forefront of B2G e-invoicing in Europe ever since the central e-invoicing platform SDI (Sistema di Interscambio) was rolled out and made mandatory for all suppliers to the public sector in 2014. While a number of its European neighbors are slowly catching up, Italy is continuing to improve the integration of […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
June 19, 2019
SAF-T – Where Are We Now?

Anyone who has been closely following SAF-T announcements over the past few years may be forgiven for thinking that it all seems rather like Groundhog Day.  Commencement dates and reporting requirements have been announced and subsequently amended and re-announced as the respective countries re-evaluate their needs and the readiness of companies to provide the data […]

Sales & Use Tax United States
June 17, 2019
South Dakota v. Wayfair One Year Later – Retrospective and Look Ahead Webinar

Since the groundbreaking Supreme Court decision in South Dakota v. Wayfair last June, tax compliance requirements of sellers have undergone a seismic shift. In recent months, we have also witnessed a series of after-shocks directed at setting the foundation for U.S. sales tax compliance in the modern age. In a live webinar and Q&A, “South […]