Italy: Is a Last-Minute Moratorium on E-invoicing Fines on the Horizon?

Francisco de la Colina
February 12, 2019

There is no doubt that the roll out of the Italian clearance e-invoicing mandate has kept the e-invoicing market and local taxpayers on their toes. Compliance with the mandate’s legal and technical requirements is not an easy task to fulfil. Consequently, taxpayers of different sectors of the economy, as well as different stakeholders of the e-invoicing supply chain affected by the mandate, have continually tried to find a way to extend the period given to adapt to the new reality.

As explained in previous posts, the Italian government provided taxpayers with a “rolling grace period” during 2019 to try and meet the needs of different sectors of the Italian economy.

Now, seven weeks into the new e-invoicing regime, news of requests for a relaxation to the framework keep arriving, but now in the form of a “moratorium on the application of fines for non-compliance.” The new request was presented by the Consiglio Nazionale dei Dottori Commercialisti e delgi Esperti Contabili – CNDCEC (the National Chartered Accountants and Accountancy Experts Council) to the Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze – MEF (the Ministry of Economy and Finance) and to the President of the Agenzia delle Entrate, the Italian tax authority.

So, what does this request for a moratorium mean?

In a nutshell, the request asks for a delay in the date for when non-compliance leads to a fine. As a general rule, most e-invoices must be issued and transmitted to the exchange system (SDI) at the time of the transaction. Non-compliance with the requirement equals sanctions in the form of fines.

However, the grace period given for taxpayers to adapt to the mandate means that transactions concluded in January can be transmitted to the SDI for clearance at the latest by the end of the tax liquidation period (i.e. by 16 February in the case of taxpayers who are subject to a monthly liquidation period), and companies would not be fined for issuing and clearing the invoice late.

The new request for a moratorium asks for a further delay before a fine would be due for late transmission to 16 March. So, if the request is approved, an e-invoice documenting a transaction that occurred in January could possibly be transmitted to the SDI by 16 March without fines*.

The problem is amplified given the short period remaining until the first liquidation period of the year ends on 18 February (the 16th is a Saturday). It remains to be seen if the Italian government can react in time and provide clarity to the situation or if it is at all inclined to agree with the request.   

Find out more about the request submitted by the CNDCEC.

*The proposal includes the delay of other deadlines to comply with other fiscal obligations that fall outside the scope of this present article.

Take Action

Read more about e-invoicing this comprehensive industry report from Sovos. Or contact Sovos about managing e-invoicing mandates in Italy. 

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Francisco de la Colina

Francisco de la Colina is a lawyer working on the regulatory team at Sovos TrustWeaver.
Share This Post

LATAM VAT & Fiscal Reporting
May 20, 2020
Sovos Acquires Taxweb, Extends Tax Determination Capabilities in World’s Most Challenging Compliance Landscape

Earlier this month Sovos announced its second acquisition of 2020, completing our solution for Brazil with an unparalleled offering that solves tax compliance in the place where it is most challenging to do so.  Too many companies doing business in Brazil have been burdened by managing multiple point solutions for continuous transaction controls (CTCs), tax […]

ShipCompliant United States
December 3, 2020
Illinois’ New Economic Nexus Sales Tax Rules to Affect Direct Wine Shippers

Starting January 1, 2021, many direct-to-consumer (DtC) wine shippers will face an added sales tax burden on their shipments to Illinois. The Illinois Department of Revenue (DOR) published FY 2021-06, which explains the upcoming change. Under the recent “Leveling the Playing Field for Illinois Retail Act,” the state will require all remote sellers with economic […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
December 2, 2020
Brexit and Fiscal Representation

Recently, we outlined the need for speed in understanding fiscal representation obligations. As the UK looks set to become a third country from 1 January 2021, there will be many ramifications for businesses operating cross-border – among them the requirement to appoint a fiscal representative to register for VAT purposes. As outlined in our previous […]

E-Invoicing Compliance EMEA Italy VAT & Fiscal Reporting
December 2, 2020
Italian Tax Controls: Five Key Facts to Know Before the New Year

While Italy rolled out its continuous transaction controls (CTC) reform in 2019, 2020 has been a year of expansion. Italian authorities plan to leverage all potential benefits of the successful implementation of the country’s central e-invoicing platform. Many of the updates will either be launched or enforced in the upcoming year, or later in 2022. […]

Tax Compliance Tax Information Reporting United States
December 1, 2020
Unclaimed Property Dormancy Periods by State: What You Need to Know

Understanding unclaimed property dormancy periods by state and executing the appropriate decisions can make or break your company’s unclaimed property program. This is due primarily to the fact that each state has varying dormancy periods. To complicate matters even further, each state has specific dormancy periods for each corresponding property type. As a result, determining […]

Sales & Use Tax United States
December 1, 2020
How Was the Nevada Economic Nexus Law Modified?

When the Supreme Court ruled on South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc., remote sellers and marketplace facilitators across the country had to make changes in how they collected and remitted sales tax. The Nevada economic nexus law is one example of a state modifying its requirements for both remote sellers and marketplace facilitators in relation to […]