Mexico Postpones the New CFDI Cancellation Process until November 2018

Francisco de la Colina
September 4, 2018

During 2017, Mexico made several changes to its eInvoicing framework. In addition to the implementation of CFDI version 3.3, modifications have been made to article 29 A of the Tax Code designed to stop the practice of suppliers unilaterally cancelling CFDIs. This process is being replaced with a bilateral process in which the buyer must also be involved.

In short, the new process means that a supplier must first issue a CFDI cancellation request using either the tax authority’s portal (which is a manual process) or through a web service integration provided by a CFDI Certification Provider. The buyer will receive notification that the supplier wishes to cancel the CFDI and will then have a period of 72 hours to either accept or reject the cancellation request. Any lack of response is considered as acceptance. Some exceptions to this general process do however apply (e.g.: CFDIs for an amount of less than 5.000 Mexican Pesos).

This new process was originally scheduled to become mandatory from July 2018, a date which was then postponed to September 2018. Due to complaints from different stakeholders in the eInvoicing market in Mexico and considering the technological and administrative burdens on taxpayers to adapt to the new framework, on Friday, August 31, the Mexican tax authority SAT announced a further extension to the deadline.  The date to to start using the new cancellation process will now be November 1, 2018.

Take Action

Learn how Sovos is helping companies in Mexico and across the globe stay ahead of disruptive changes in tax.

Author
Francisco de la Colina
Francisco de la Colina is a lawyer working on the regulatory team at Sovos TrustWeaver.

Relevant Posts

New York Implements Economic Nexus by Resuscitating 1980’s Law

When New York first passed its law defining what constitutes a “vendor” subject to collecting sales tax in the 1980’s, the idea of online shopping sounded like science fiction. In retrospect, NY may have effectively enacted the first “economic nexus” law when they drafted their definition of “vendor” to include a person who regularly or […]

Read More
IRS Uses Unprecedented Methods to Enforce ACA Reporting Penalties

With recent enforcement measures, the IRS has offered definitive proof that the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is still alive and that the agency plans to strictly enforce ACA reporting. Last spring, the agency issued Letter 226J to Applicable Large Employers (ALEs) that failed to cover 95 percent of employees. ALEs are companies with 50 or […]

Read More
Government Shutdown Will Not Move IRS 1099 Reporting Deadlines

UPDATE (Jan. 8): Reporting season is moving forward according to plan. The IRS has announced that it will process tax returns on schedule and without delays. While the agency will clarify its contingency plan in the coming days, organizations should proceed as planned with 1099 reporting and other seasonal filings. The IRS will recall a […]

Read More
4 Big Post-Wayfair State Sales Tax Developments to Watch 2019

The South Dakota v. Wayfair decision last June has created a lot of angst for indirect tax professionals and the businesses they work so hard to protect from the burdens of sales and use tax filing. Six months later as we begin the new year, that angst has not gotten any lighter. Any federal legislative […]

Read More
The 5 Biggest Stories in Indirect Tax Compliance 2018

2018 was a volatile year in indirect tax compliance for tax, finance and IT professionals worldwide. With an increase in globalization and tax gaps surpassing tens of billions in some countries, it’s not surprising that one of the biggest challenges governments are addressing is revenue collection. Like enterprises, governments are creating new, technology-driven processes to […]

Read More