Does the Market Require E-Invoicing Compliance and VAT Automation in One Service?

Christiaan Van Der Valk
September 12, 2017

Two years ago, a small number of forward-looking enterprises issued RFPs requesting ‘end-to-end invoice compliance automation services’. These RFPs requested all VAT-related compliance decisions to be managed through a single SaaS platform which integrated with the requesting company’s invoicing engine. In this article, we’re exploring the background and implications of this apparent evolution in market behavior.

Compliance automation vendor landscape challenged

This RFP approach puzzled the vendor community, which traditionally was used to these services being provided by at least two separate types of vendors:

  1. ‘Form compliance’ vendors, which usually have a background in ‘trust services’ that are rooted in public key infrastructure. These vendors specialize in ensuring compliance with requirements that aim to give tax administrations comfort that electronic invoices are worth looking at in the first place – which isn’t the case if you cannot be sure they aren’t fake or modified. These VAT requirements are about managing the evidence of integrity and authenticity of e-invoices throughout their legal life cycle.
  2. ‘Content compliance’ vendors, which usually have a background in legal information services. These vendors specialize in ‘tax engine’ functionality, which helps enterprises determine the applicable laws, associated VAT percentage or other transaction taxes when creating or receiving invoices. Some of these services also verify or suggest invoice notifications that are related to the tax percentage, or assist with reporting.

Importantly, the integration of these software packages (whether locally installed or consumed as a service via the internet) has historically taken place in different parts of the enterprise software ecosystem: form compliance vendors normally target transaction platforms, while content compliance vendors have nearly always been integrated with ERP systems. This varying focus has reinforced the notion that these are fundamentally different types of compliance automation functionality.

Reasons for a shift in market behavior

We have discussed this matter with a number of VAT managers who are thinking about their future needs in the VAT compliance automation area. Their assessment, alongside ours, consists of two interrelated components:

  1. Real-time controls increase exposure: the risks related to VAT discrepancies being exposed and caught by tax administrations is quickly increasing as a result of tax controls evolving from periodic aggregate reports to invoice-by-invoice real-time reporting or ‘clearance’ approvals.
  2. With VAT controls evolving from periodic to transactional and real-time, it will sometimes be more natural to apply tax determination functionality closer to transactional engines rather than close to the ERP. We particularly see this need arise in scenarios where a large part of the underlying business process is run by a third party vendor platform.

A case of market consolidation?

Would an enterprise looking for this next-generation combination of form and content compliance services necessarily care if they are provided by different vendors? The answer we received is ‘no, but’. ‘No’ because, ultimately, it’s for vendors to decide what is the most cost-effective way of managing skills and specialization to guarantee the best possible business value to their customers. ‘But’, because there are many administrative, legal, technical, operational and other issues that drive costs on the user side and which vendors are often not perfectly equipped to assess. When controls that businesses must perform are driven by the same body of law, and when they must be performed as part of the same enterprise process and system, companies will often expect to contract for such functionality with one and the same vendor to keep overhead in these areas to a minimum.

How will vendors adjust?

We at Sovos are thinking actively about the strategic impact of this shift in market expectations. As can be judged from recent press releases from other vendors in the broader compliance automation and e-invoicing space, we’re not the only ones.

We would be interested in your feedback on these matters:

  • Do you agree that this is a market trend?
  • Are you working on an RFP combining these compliance areas?
  • Are there other trends you believe we should consider in this context?

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Christiaan Van Der Valk

Christiaan Van Der Valk is vice president, strategy. Elected a World Economic Forum Global Leader for Tomorrow in 2000, Christiaan is an internationally recognized voice on e-business strategy, law, policy, best practice and commercial issues. Formerly co-founder and president of Trustweaver (acquired by Sovos), Christiaan also holds long-standing leadership roles at the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) and the European E-invoicing Service Providers Association (EESPA). Over the past 20 years, he has presented at and authored key papers for international meetings at the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), the Asia Europe Meeting, World Trade Organization and several other UN agencies. Christiaan earned his Master of Laws degree from Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam.
Share this post

North America ShipCompliant
April 17, 2024
3 Reasons Craft Beer Drinkers Want DtC Shipping

While only 11 states and D.C. allow direct-to-consumer (DtC) beer shipping, more than half of Americans ages 21+ (51%) would purchase more craft beer if they were able to have it shipped directly to their home. In this blog, we discuss the top three reasons why craft beer drinkers want beer sent directly to them […]

North America ShipCompliant
April 17, 2024
States Are Looking to Expand DtC Spirits & Beer Availability

2024 is shaping up to be a banner year for legislative efforts related to the direct-to-consumer (DtC) shipping of beverage alcohol. While these proposed laws span a range of legal issues, the primary driver of the bills is expanding access to the DtC market for beer and spirits producers. Currently, 47 states and D.C. permit […]

North America Tax Information Reporting
March 22, 2024
Market Conduct Annual Statement Reminders and More

On the second Wednesday of each month, Sovos experts host a 30-minute webinar, Water Cooler Wednesday, to share the latest updates on statutory filings. In March, Sarah Stubbs shared information about the many filings due after March 1, from Market Conduct Annual Statements to health supplements for P&C and life insurers writing A&H businesses and […]

North America ShipCompliant
March 21, 2024
How Producers Can Build a DtC Shipping Market

Direct-to-consumer (DtC) shipping has become one of the leading sales models for businesses of all sizes and in all markets. The idea of connecting directly with consumers is notably attractive, as it helps brands develop a personal relationship and avoid costly distribution chains. Yet, for all its popularity, DtC is often a hard concept to […]

North America ShipCompliant
March 20, 2024
Key Findings from the 2024 DtC Beer Shipping Report

This March, Sovos ShipCompliant released the fourth annual Direct-to-Consumer Beer Shipping Report in partnership with the Brewers Association. The DtC beer shipping report features exclusive insights on the regulatory state of the direct-to-consumer (DtC) channel, Brewers Association’s perspective and key data from a consumer preferences survey. Let’s take a deeper dive into some of the […]