Latin American 2016 Business Forecast: Four Trends to Watch

Steve Sprague
January 6, 2016

2015 was a banner year for Latin American tax authorities, introducing more countries and more complications into the compliance landscape. For example, Brazil expanded its business-to-government mandates from e-invoicing to requirements that affect accounting, inventory management and personnel, while Mexico, Peru, Uruguay, Ecuador, Colombia and Chile introduced significant expansions of their e-invoicing and tax legislation. As we embark on 2016, what’s ahead? Expect even more challenges as compliance continues to be an issue affecting businesses throughout the region.

Automating audit triggers increases governments’ tax revenue potential.

Latin American governments initially introduced e-invoicing mandates to curb VAT (value added tax) fraud. A UN report estimates that VAT evasion costs Latin American governments 17.8% to 37% of their total VAT intakes each year, compared with 3% to 22% for other VAT-based societies. E-invoicing mandates have already cut into that fraud. Brazil, for example, collected $58 billion in additional tax revenue in a single year, and Mexico saw a 34% VAT collection increase in a single quarter, realizing a $4.65 return on every dollar spent on auditing.

Now, governments throughout Latin America are trending toward collecting even more detailed data – accounting reports, inventory records, etc., that allow officials to automatically verify purchase orders, invoices and goods receipts.

Governments expanding compliance scope from VAT to payroll taxes.

Learn about 2016 trends in Latin AmericaNow that governments are starting to see tangible revenues from their e-invoicing programs, many are moving into other potential areas of tax fraud – specifically, payroll taxes. The same UN report estimates that personal and corporate income tax evasion are even higher than that of VAT, ranging from 46% to 49% of total receipts for these taxes from 2006-2010. Considering that up to half of Latin America’s economies are unbanked and cash based, payroll taxes are a logical first step to curbing this evasion (though we anticipate them going much further to encompass cash transactions like purchases in the near future). Mexico was the first to introduce such legislation with its Nomina Electronica in 2014, requiring electronic registration of payroll receipts. Brazil quickly followed suit with more comprehensive human resource legislation, eSocial.

Business are punished when they don’t “shop local.”

In a further effort to increase tax revenues at home and stabilize their emerging economies, Latin American governments are looking at regulations that incentivize corporations for using local suppliers, manufacturing and workers, and/or penalize those who don’t. In Brazil, new reports scrutinize inventory and production, giving the government added visibility into supply chains and manufacturing processes. The SEFAZ, Brazil’s tax authority, is using this information, coupled with e-invoicing transactions, to develop punitive tax rates for companies purchasing the majority of their raw materials and supplies outside of the country. Under Brazil’s FCI rules, if more than 60% of a company’s goods come from exports, their in country VAT tax rate is higher.

Governments are scrutinizing profit manipulation (i.e., capital flight).

After successfully recruiting multinational companies with tax incentives and the promise of less expensive operations, Latin American countries are now demanding their fair share of tax revenues. $154 billion is estimated to flow from Latin America to jurisdictions with lower tax rates through illicit capital flow, according to the UN report. Countries world-wide, not just in Latin America, are implementing procedures to combat this issue and ensure that companies pay taxes where they conduct business, as it’s estimated that 4% to 10% of global corporate tax revenues are lost to such “capital flight” each year. At the request of global governments, the Organisation for Economic Co‑operation and Development (OECD), has developed a country-by-country reporting template that provides a clear view of profits, sales, assets and taxes paid, which will be adopted in many areas in 2016.

Compliance is serious business in Latin America.

It’s clear that governments throughout Latin America take tax collections seriously, and are implementing comprehensive steps to reduce tax evasion and fraud to maximize their revenues. In fact, Mexico recently withheld more than $384 million in VAT refunds to Colgate, Procter & Gamble and Unilever as it carefully scrutinized their operations. Multinational companies operating in this region need to manage compliance proactively, monitor trends to determine the next area of operations that will be affected and update processes accordingly. Learn more about how Sovos reduces the risk and cost of maintaining compliance, empowering clients to capitalize on e-invoicing requirements to improve supply chain efficiency and optimize cash flow.

Listen to webinar replay to learn about the top best practices for implementing SAP in Latin America

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Steve Sprague

Steve Sprague serves as General Manager for international products at Sovos. His electronic invoicing and Business-to-Government reporting expertise stems from nearly 20 years of experience in the industry, with the last 10 years focused on the compliance regimes across Latin America and Europe. Steve manages International go-to-market strategy and field enablement which has led to the firm’s double-digit revenue/sales growth in the last three years.
Share This Post

LATAM VAT & Fiscal Reporting
May 20, 2020
Sovos Acquires Taxweb, Extends Tax Determination Capabilities in World’s Most Challenging Compliance Landscape

Earlier this month Sovos announced its second acquisition of 2020, completing our solution for Brazil with an unparalleled offering that solves tax compliance in the place where it is most challenging to do so.  Too many companies doing business in Brazil have been burdened by managing multiple point solutions for continuous transaction controls (CTCs), tax […]

E-Invoicing Compliance EMEA Turkey VAT & Fiscal Reporting
July 15, 2020
Cancellation and Refund Policies for E-Invoice and E-Arşiv Invoice

Taxpayers with annual gross sales of TRY 5 million and above are obliged to use e-invoice or e-arşiv invoice from 1 July 2020. Although the e-invoice has the same qualities as a paper invoice, there are occasions where it should be treated differently such as for cancellations and refunds. What is a refund invoice? A […]

EMEA IPT
July 15, 2020
Pay-Per-Mile Car Insurance – How Do You Tax That?

Car insurance premiums are always making headlines. With the cost of insurance for younger drivers continuing to rise, a new generation of drivers are questioning the need to own a car. Many drivers who live in the city or commute often only use their cars on weekends, but the cost to insure a car that […]

ShipCompliant
July 14, 2020
Kentucky DtC Shipping Laws Delayed

Earlier this year, Kentucky passed a bill enabling direct-to-consumer (DtC) shipping of wine, beer, and spirits by licensed suppliers. When the bill was originally passed, it was expected it would take effect by July 15, 2020. However, as our partners at Wine Institute recently confirmed, the state is instituting a delay on the implementation of […]

Asia Pacific E-Invoicing Compliance VAT & Fiscal Reporting
July 14, 2020
Asia: E-invoicing Developments Across the Region

The world has witnessed how several Latin American countries have successfully adopted e-invoices to replace paper versions and close VAT gaps – the difference between the revenue governments are entitled to receive and what they de facto manage to collect.    The positive effects of mandatory e-invoicing regimes, such as achieving simplification of the invoicing […]

ShipCompliant
July 13, 2020
How Importers Can Ship DtC

The beverage alcohol industry has many complicated rules and regulations that vary by state. Even though importers are similar to other members of the “supplier” tier (like wineries and breweries), they are often treated differently in federal and state regulations. This is particularly true when it comes to direct-to-consumer (DtC) wine shipping.  Currently, 46 states […]