Brazil Nota Fiscal version 3.1– (Part 4 of 6) On-premise change management involves too many people, different groups, different system developers

Scott Lewin
January 11, 2014

Top 5 Reasons Why Companies are Using Brazil version 3.1 to Transition off of on-premise solutions on to Hybrid Cloud and Managed Service Solutions

If you are managing Brazil compliance on-premise, did you realize you, not your provider, are staffing SD, MM, FICO Analysts, Business Users, Middleware Architects, Subject Matter Experts, ABAP developers just to maintain compliance in Brazil? Yes, just maintenance – no business innovation – just maintenance. Below are all the costs that you need to take into consideration when looking at the real cost of maintaining compliance in Brazil with an on-premise solution.

As Brazil is mandating a new schema (Brazil NFe 3.1), now is the opportunity to review your compliance strategy in Brazil. Companies that are transitioning to Hybrid Cloud providers are reducing their maintenance costs in Latin America by upwards of 80%. Below I cover many of the overlooked costs; however, if you would like a copy of the (Brazil NFe 2014 – TCO Calculator) that outlines your current cost structure as well as your upgrade costs – please feel free to reach out to me directly.

Cost always overlooked include:

  • Total Implementation Costs of Annual Updates
    • Research and implement the latest OSS notes from SAP – for most SAP companies they are not on the latest version, so this is not as easy as it may seem
    • SAP Functional Team – Orders To Cash, Procure To Pay, Financials
    • ABAP developer
    • Middleware Architect
    • Local user costs for testing
    • Project manager
    • Subject Matter Expert (Design and deploy SAP configurations based on the legislation – most companies spend weeks trying to figure out how to get their SAP system to work with government requirements and customer requirements at the same time)
    • Set up costs for the local provider to test your files
  • Overlooked data center costs
    • Cost of the middleware (for SAP PI this is usually the cost of non-SAP integration data charge)
    • Maintenance on middleware
    • Hardware for middleware
    • Hardware maintenance for middleware
    • Minimum deployment across a three –tier SAP deployment (PROD, TEST, DEV)
  • Ongoing Support costs to include
    • Annual cost for compliance server
    • Cost for Technical Support
      • Someone has to monitor and manage the middleware issues
      • Someone has to monitor and manage the SAP system – an invoice isn’t done until it is posted or acknowledged in the ERP system
      • ABAP developer
        • Changes based on the law 2-3 times per year, per country
        • Changes based on customer requests
          • Could affect SAP master data, middleware, PDF output or distribution rules
      • Annual cost to upgrade the system based on government changes
        • Look at a percentage of the functional analysts, middleware architect, project manager and SME (subject matter experts) for a time period each year
  • Financial Operation Costs
    • Cost of controllers to correct information prior to SPED reporting
    • Audit risks of non-compliance (~500 Reais per incorrect XML that is not valid and archived, 75% to 150% fines based on incorrect taxes)
    • Foreign Corrupt Practices issues – one High-Tech company is currently in a legal dispute over incorrect taxes with Brazil SEFAZ for almost 2.9 Billion US dollars
    • Account Payable staffing cost for manual data entry and supplier invoice processing: SAP PO and Goods Receipt – as you don’t want to pay mismatched invoices – you are responsible for the wrong taxes
  • Logistics – did you realize that Brazil Nota Fiscal legislation affects both your ability to ship outbound as well as receive goods at the warehouse
    • Outbound – if you do not have an automatic “contingency process” – you most likely have had your operations shut down for days (who can afford this during the World Cup, let alone the Olympics).
    • Inbound Receiving – leading organizations are reducing the cost of receiving trucks at their warehouse by over 40%. This is done by taking advantage of the government process to automate data entry and matching within the SAP system.

So when you are looking to find dollars in tightened IT budgets, look at the total cost of operating your SAP ERP across your Latin America divisions. On-premise once made sense, as it was the only solution option. However, On-Premise solutions do not take advantage of the economies of scale of the government standardization. Are you in the business of being an expert on Brazil Nota Fiscal?

The answer should be no.

There are providers that operate new business models – Hybrid Cloud models. They offer the economies of scale of the network, but also solve the internal SAP customization support and maintenance issues with native SAP extensions. This concept of Hybrid Cloud is key. It is the only business model that solves the end to end business problem and it’s why companies are turning away from On-Premise solutions.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Scott Lewin

Gain timely insight and important up to the minute information about the current legislative changes in Latin America, including Brazil Nota Fiscal, Mexico CFDI, Argentina AFIP and Chile DTE. Learn how these changes affect your operations, your finances and also your Information Technology teams.
Share this post

North America ShipCompliant
April 17, 2024
3 Reasons Craft Beer Drinkers Want DtC Shipping

While only 11 states and D.C. allow direct-to-consumer (DtC) beer shipping, more than half of Americans ages 21+ (51%) would purchase more craft beer if they were able to have it shipped directly to their home. In this blog, we discuss the top three reasons why craft beer drinkers want beer sent directly to them […]

North America ShipCompliant
April 17, 2024
States Are Looking to Expand DtC Spirits & Beer Availability

2024 is shaping up to be a banner year for legislative efforts related to the direct-to-consumer (DtC) shipping of beverage alcohol. While these proposed laws span a range of legal issues, the primary driver of the bills is expanding access to the DtC market for beer and spirits producers. Currently, 47 states and D.C. permit […]

North America Tax Information Reporting
March 22, 2024
Market Conduct Annual Statement Reminders and More

On the second Wednesday of each month, Sovos experts host a 30-minute webinar, Water Cooler Wednesday, to share the latest updates on statutory filings. In March, Sarah Stubbs shared information about the many filings due after March 1, from Market Conduct Annual Statements to health supplements for P&C and life insurers writing A&H businesses and […]

North America ShipCompliant
March 21, 2024
How Producers Can Build a DtC Shipping Market

Direct-to-consumer (DtC) shipping has become one of the leading sales models for businesses of all sizes and in all markets. The idea of connecting directly with consumers is notably attractive, as it helps brands develop a personal relationship and avoid costly distribution chains. Yet, for all its popularity, DtC is often a hard concept to […]

North America ShipCompliant
March 20, 2024
Key Findings from the 2024 DtC Beer Shipping Report

This March, Sovos ShipCompliant released the fourth annual Direct-to-Consumer Beer Shipping Report in partnership with the Brewers Association. The DtC beer shipping report features exclusive insights on the regulatory state of the direct-to-consumer (DtC) channel, Brewers Association’s perspective and key data from a consumer preferences survey. Let’s take a deeper dive into some of the […]