Challenges of Running an On-Premise Compliance Solution in Brazil

Scott Lewin
April 12, 2013

There is a definite trend for companies using SAP to move away from in-house software solutions because of the maintenance difficulties imposed by the changing legislation in Brazil.

Many companies looked at Brazil Nota Fiscal over the past few years as just another invoice process and compliance solution that could be managed in-house. However, as more organization move business processes into shared services and look to consolidate on single instances or regional instances of their SAP, they are finding that the true cost of ownership is extremely high. Below are the two most common themes I see when speaking with customers looking to move away from an in-house Nota Fiscal solution:

  • Organizations have grown through acquisitions in Latin America, especially in Brazil over the past 5 years. Many of the companies that were acquired also ran SAP, but companies found themselves supporting multiple instances. As the IT team took on consolidation, they often realized that moving Brazil into a shared instance immediately opened their eyes to the real support costs of Nota Fiscal. It was not the XML schema or the web service connection – the real cost was due to the amount of changes coming from the government and the effect these changes had on SAP configurations. Rather than maintaining multiple FTE to research the changes, research how they should be implemented inside of SAP, and manage the constant flow of SAP upgrades; organizations have been turning to providers that eliminate this in-house problem. They have been turning to managed services that monitor the changes, understand how to implement them in SAP, and guarantee ongoing compliance of the SAP system and process under a fixed annual fee.
  • Another reason organizations are moving away from in-house solutions is the regional expansion of compulsory electronic invoicing throughout Latin America. Most on premise software implementations only handle one country, leaving a global SAP team to manage multiple vendors in multiple countries. Supporting multiple FTEs for day to day support, multiple boxes, multiple integration brokers, and a multitude of country specific solutions adds up to hundreds of thousands of dollars when viewed in the aggregate. A regional approach not only frees up IT budgets, a regional approach also frees up needed IT resources. It is much more beneficial to have resources working on new value added projects rather than maintenance of a country process.

More simply stated: companies are moving to managed services for Nota Fiscal because of the out of control cost to service the in-house software day to day and more importantly manage the ongoing changes that happen every year. Before you make a decision, make sure you talk with companies who have lived through the painful days of an in-house solution (including lines of trucks sitting at their loading docks waiting for documents and multiple days of not being able to ship because their Nota Fiscal solution was broken) and are now singing the praises of the cloud solution. FYI – let me know if you need help finding one of these references…there are plenty!!!

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Scott Lewin

Gain timely insight and important up to the minute information about the current legislative changes in Latin America, including Brazil Nota Fiscal, Mexico CFDI, Argentina AFIP and Chile DTE. Learn how these changes affect your operations, your finances and also your Information Technology teams.
Share This Post

EMEA IPT
September 18, 2019
Three Key Steps to Apply IPT on New Lines of Business

In the increasingly complex world of IPT, understanding, assessing and applying the right taxes to new insurance products can be a challenge for insurers when complying with fragmented regulations. As new risks continue to emerge, so do new insurance products. But how can insurers ensure insurance premium tax (IPT) is correctly applied? The three questions […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
September 17, 2019
Why Storage of Electronic Invoices in the EU Gets Complicated Quickly

It’s very possible that US companies are breaking laws governing storage of electronic invoices in the European Union without realizing they’re putting themselves at risk for financial penalties.  The EU is an entity that, as the Brexit debate has shown, can frustrate and baffle its own citizens. In the US, the EU is frequently misunderstood. […]

Tax Information Reporting United States
September 16, 2019
6 Reasons You Should Attend the 2019 GCS Intelligent Reporting Summit

The tax information reporting event of the year is coming in October! Sovos will present the 2019 GCS Intelligent Reporting Summit in San Antonio Oct. 28-30. You can’t afford to miss it! Here’s why:  NEW! Unclaimed Property Regulations: De-mystify unclaimed property reporting and learn how to protect your company from risk you might not even […]

Tax Information Reporting United States
September 13, 2019
California AB5 Gig Economy Bill will Affect Tax Reporting, But How?

California Governor Gavin Newsom is poised to sign into law a bill that would recategorize gig economy workers such as ride-share drivers from being independent workers to full-time employees.  The bill, California AB5, could have a profound impact on tax withholding and information reporting at state levels, with other states closely monitoring California’s activity. It […]

Sales & Use Tax United States
September 12, 2019
New Sales Tax Laws Require Ecommerce Retailers to Step up Cyber Monday 2019 Preparations

5 steps ecommerce retailers should take to prepare for Cyber Monday 2019 Retailers with ecommerce channels have a lot to gain during Cyber Monday or Cyber Week in 2019. According to BlackFriday.com, Cyber Monday spending is anticipated to grow 20% this year, with consumers spending nearly $9.5 billion online. Cyber Monday also falls on December […]